David Cronenberg, a filmmaker with a peerless grasp on the mysteries of the mind and the body, turns his attention to a seminal chapter in the founding of psychoanalysis. Adapted from Christopher Hampton’s play A Talking Cure, A Dangerous Method charts the relationship between Sigmund Freud and his protégé turned dissenter Carl Jung, as it was shaped by the case of Sabine Spielrein, a young Russian Jewish patient of Jung’s. Cronenberg brilliantly dramatizes not just the rivalry and rupture between two pioneers who defined a field but also the birth of their groundbreaking theories of the unconscious and the forces of Eros and Thanatos. Featuring an electrifying trio of lead actors, who turn near-mythic figures into flesh and blood, this is a film of tremendous vigor and ambition, a historical drama that brings ideas to life. —NYFF
David Cronenberg, also known as the King of Venereal Horror or the Baron of blood, was born in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, in 1943. His father was a journalist, and his mother was a piano player. After showing an inclination for literature at an early age (he wrote and published eerie short stories, thus following his father’s path) and for music (playing classical guitar until he was 12), Cronenberg graduated from the University of Toronto with a degree in Literature after switching from the science department. He reached the cult status of horror-meister with the gore-filled, modern-vampire variations of Shivers (1975) and Rabid (1977), following an experimental apprenticeship in independent filmmaking and in Canadian television programs.
Cronenberg gained popularity with the head-exploding, telepathy-based Scanners (1981) after the release of the much underrated, controversial, and autobiographical The Brood (1979). Cronenberg become a sort… read more
Fantastic. The psychoanalytical conversations between Jung and Freud and Jung and Spielrein work as a metaphor for the way we engage with art, from cinephiles practicing film theory to our close readings of auteurist television like Mad Men or The Sopranos. Jung doesn't believe in coincidences and neither do we. Everything has significance, or at least that's the ideal.
"The History of Violence" is the last film by Cronenberg that i truly admire. Everything that came out afterwards seems fake to me. There is no "raw" material in his films anymore...This one was alright but if you compare it to his earlier works, it's a zero. I miss that creepy, disturbing feeling which once was so common in his films...
Venice! The Biennale! Retrospectives, new films, festival turmoil, art that’s not cinema—all this and more!
A stunning new look at Dead Ringers (1998).
In our annual poll, we pair our favorite new films of 2011 with older films seen in the same year to create fantastic double features.
David Cronenberg’s film tackles Jung, Freud and psychosexual frontiers with a supreme, stately restraint.
“A meticulous, electric costume drama of adultery and rivalry.”
Turns out, the focus this time around is on the performances by Keira Knightley, Michael Fassbender and Viggo Mortensen.
A look at the posters for the films in the main slate of this year’s New York Film Festival.
David Cronenberg’s A Dangerous Method tackles Jung, Freud and psychosexual frontiers with a supreme, stately restraint.
Strong first reviews for Cronenberg’s retelling of the Sabina Spielrein case.
Last week, right in the middle of the Cannes Film Festival, when half the world's film journalists were taking in the new Terrence Malick and
An intellectual, rather than romantic, triangle. A battle of ideas waged by passionate people who’s influence is still strong more than 100 years later. In many ways, I think the movie would be more… read review
http://embryons.wordpress.com/2011/11/25/a-dangerous-method-cronenberg-2011/
When one thinks of psychology, very few would think to associate it with physics. Yet, the origins of Sigmund Freud’s… read review
This is admirably a good chunk of Oscar bait with it being a period piece about a famous and controversial figure, but even so, this has an immense level of merits. It looks absolutely beautiful… read review
Cronenberg’s worst film to date. A poorly acted period piece cobbled together like a soap opera. The script did not provide any interest to the relationship between Freud and Jung and was often stilted… read review