Downtrodden writer Henry (Mickey Rourke) and distressed goddess Wanda (Faye Dunaway) aren’t exactly husband and wife: they’re wedded to their bar stools. But they like each other’s company – and Barfly captures their giddy, din-soaked attempts to make a go of life on the skids. —Warner Home Video
Barbet Schroeder’s Swiss geologist father was on assignment in Iran when he was born. After a globe-trotting childhood, Schroeder was educated at the Sorbonne; then, like half the under-30 population of France (or so it seemed), he became a movie critic. Brief jobs as a jazz concert producer and news photographer followed before Schroeder went to work as an assistant for one of his role models, French director Jean-Luc Godard. In 1964, the 22-year-old Schroeder set up his own film production company, Les Films du Losange. Among the many prominent pictures produced by Schroeder include director Eric Rohmer’s “Moral Tales” La Collectioneuse (1966), My Night at Maud’s (1969), and Claire’s Knee (1970). Schroeder himself turned director with 1969’s More, gaining critical attention with several unorthodox documentaries. With the American film Barfly (1987), Schroeder established himself as a prime purveyor of “slice of life” drama — albeit entertaining enough to please the crowd. Oscar nominated… read more
Excellent film sur Bukowski (même si ce n'est pas vraiment un "biopic"). C'est tiré d'un des livres du vieux Hank je crois, et le personnage de Mickey Rourke est une représentation de Bukowski probablement assez réaliste.
Captures the spirit of Bukowski's prose nicely, I suppose the fact that he wrote it helps, but most directors don't respectfully adhere to the voice of the writer the way Barbet Schroeder does here. If you're a fan of this movie, read Bukowski's novel HOLLYWOOD, in which Bukowski talks about making this movie the way only he can through his Henry Chinaski alter-ego.
"Nothing but the dripping sink. Empty bottle. Euphoria. Youth fenced in, stabbed and shaved. Taut words propped up to die" http://youtu.be/mLMXuoyQ67Y ... Bukowski and Dirty realism.
Mike is wrong; Bukowski rather liked Rourke's performance by the end. He says so in the accompanying interview tapes.
This is correct. Bukowski had his criticisms, but he is on record as saying seeing Rourke play Chinaski brought him back to the old days when he was drinking, fighting, writing, and generally being a misanthrope.
In the novel Hollywood, Chinaski (not Bukowski) refers to the performance from Rourke's character favorably. However, in an interview, Bukowski stated that Rourke "got it wrong" and "played it up too much." If I could track down the interview video, I would link it. Although Chinaski does serve as a fictional alter-ego for Bukowski, he is still a fictional character. Fictional text is not good evidence of Buk's opinion on the performance. Suffice it to say that none of us knew Bukowski personally, so none of us know for sure what he really thought.
Bukowski abhorred this depiction of himself. In Bukowski: Born into This, he describes Rourke as a pretty boy w/ long hair who didn’t get it right. In the same documentary, director Barbet Shroeder… read review
This movie happened to be a chance discovery. I had planned to watch it while getting drunk on new years eve but fortunately or unfortunately I happened to do something else that night. I watched this… read review
It’s funny, I watch this and think sometimes that Mikey Rourke has created a liquid man in his portrayal of Henry Chinaski. He flows around the screen, his movements are fluid, his speech is fluid… read review