Please login to continue.
Reviews of Blade Runner
Displaying all 12 reviews
lasttimeisaw
21Mar12
Title: Blade Runner
Year: 1982
Language: English
Country: USA, Hong Kong
Genre: Sci-Fi, Thriller
Director: Ridley Scott
Writers:
Hampton Fancher
David Webb Peoples
Philip K. Dick
Cast:
Harrison Ford
Rutger Hauer
Sean Young
Daryl Hannah
William Sanderson
Joe Turkel
Edward James Olmos
M. Emmet Walsh
Joanna Cassidy
James Hong
Morgan Paull
Kevin Thompson
Rating: 9/10
I have finished this epochal cult film’s final cut version (not much as a rematch since it vaguely left me any impression from the very first encounter, which took place more than 10 years ago), the film hasn’t dated at all for 30 years, is still sharply crafty with an astonishingly visual impetus, which is pristinely avant-garde as well as its subversive kernel about the clone ethnics.
BLADE RUNNER is an atypical Sci-Fi breed (loosely based on science fiction mogul Philip K. Dick’s novel “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?”), especially among its time overlapping with STAR WARS trilogy’s heyday, it turns a completely opposite aesthetic approach (the nearly all moist and dingy settings, an anti-hero and anti-villain characterization, a foredoomed fatalism spin, the grotesque costume and character moulding, parsimonious fighting sequences), which bears itself out as one of the paramount film in its genre. The film might be trapped in its lengthy narrative tempo, but every single scene is devised with a cataclysmic desperation, resembles Ridley Scott’s renowned career-breaking masterpiece ALIEN (1979).
While Harrison Ford plays against his comfort zone as a battered “human” blade runner, its’s Rutger Hauer’s replicant Roy Batty overshadows everyone else, buoyed up the somber aura using his near hysterical interpretation of a perplexed highly-intellectual creature whose resentment and despair are so palatable and evocative.
The birth of the film was a notorious plight at that time, with an alienated team and financial lapse, even after its theatrical release, its flaccid box office performance sentenced the demise of its outlook, that said, it is a film ahead of its audience by many years, and now its classic rank has been established, how comforting and gratifying.
ps. this year Scott’s much-hyped prequel of ALIEN sega, PROMETHEUS has unveiled its second trailer, which seems that Scott is back on his virtuoso trajectory, another bona fide classic is forthcoming? This summer it is a battle between PROMETHEUS and THE DARK KNIGHT RISES, keeping fingers crossed it will be a win-win denouement.
- Currently 5.0/5 Stars.
Jordan K. Ellis
2Feb12
When I first viewed the director’s cut of Blade Runner (1982), around age 14, I was simply astonished by the use of cinematic beauty juxtaposed by a post-apocalyptic cyberpunk backdrop, including the establishing shot of the city skyline that sets off the film by storm. However as I started to view the film more than once, I began to realize of what the film represents both in an existential and socially economic way of thinking. It prompts question after question. What truly lingers in our memories? Is the whole world itself just fabricated; life itself just a lie? What is the emotional impact that machines/replicants “actually” feel? It is the “beginning and end” or, in some vague sense, the “beginning of the end;” the overall theme of life and death. The film may well be one of the most ingenious productions ever made.
Philip K. Dick’s name has become the epitome of pure science fiction writing, but this is matched by his intellect and the social commentary he is able to convey in viewing mankind and advancements of technology in the future. His 1968 novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? gave an insight of planet Earth choking to death due to nuclear war. It is a philosophical message that mankind should know its fault with chaos and devastation desperately trying to reconstruct civilization in space to bring life anew. One has to acknowledge the social crisis that the world was facing during the Cold War Era when the book was written. America and the Soviet Union had destructive arsenals capable of destroying millions, and the Cuban Missile Crisis led us close to nuclear war.
The novel is very poignant and experimental in a way to take all these serious elements in tone and implant in a detective story. Normally, in contemporary detective stories or, in another viewpoint, film-noirs, the whole world becomes foreboding. This characteristic gives the whole environment emotion. Both versions explore the thematic structure of a dystopian setting, desperately searching for a meaning in a world that always seems to be ending. This was Philip K. Dick’s analytical study of the future. The book, as well as the film, plays as a cautionary piece about how to stay human, but it ultimately reflects on how to stay spiritual in such a bleak world. There is much allegorical meaning within the visualization of story.
The original story of Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? gave a fair view of the world itself described almost as a giant dustbowl with cities in decay, androids running amuck, different species of animal going extinct, and humanity trying to rebuild civilization in space. Reading the material somehow played with your thought process, hinting at who was human and who was not. It presents an ecological concern for pollution and overpopulation. It was actually my second time reading the novel, and this time, it seemed much more much more ambiguous, giving a clear study of machines or androids with human emotions. The plot itself is a detective story involving a bounty hunter named Rick Deckard, as he has been given the assignment of killing (or how the book says, “retiring”) androids as they are proclaimed illegal on Earth. The writing itself gives the blend of a noir style of expression, matched by a surrealist way of thinking.
Deckard is the one that tries to search for an empathic meaning about of human morals as the story progresses, even if means killing other androids and having sexual contact with one of them for finding a meaning. Animals in the original story play a prominent role. Since life on Earth is now on the verge of extinction, different species of animal are sacred. Humans have completely lost the balance of nature, and subsequently they, want rare animals as pets to remind themselves of the nature they once endured. Incidentally, Deckard owns an electrical sheep; a distinct metaphor for the happiness in life that has been taken away by the advancement of new applied sciences and technologies. An animal that presents itself being false life.
With this idea in mind about the future, came Blade Runner, which is a looser adaptation of Philip K. Dick’s novel. But still as you are viewing the film, you are completely overwhelmed by the world that becomes almost dream-like. It plays out as a nostalgic yearning of memories. The thematic structures still stay faithful to the androids becoming more human and memories from other people being implanted. The term, “android” has been substituted by the term, “replicant,” a rather poignant way of expressing a mere copy of a human being. The setting takes place in 2019 and follows Deckard, a “blade runner” who is assigned to track down and kill six rebel replicants who have returned to Earth illegally from the “off-world colonies” in space. Now they are on the loose in Los Angeles (San Diego in the book). The world is portrayed as a new wave of tech-noir, acid rain always pouring down, and overpopulation with other cultures blending in. It also brings out the cyberpunk feel, a dystopian future.
Blade Runner has also superb casting, especially Harrison Ford playing a neo-Humphrey Bogart type of character. Rachel played by Sean Young as a replicant and love interest to Deckard, always pure and beautiful. Edward James Olmos as the sly Detective Gaff, always folding origami that becomes consistent to the story. Joe Turkel as Eldon Tyrell, the founder of the Tyrell Corporation, playing almost a false prophet if one were to look at the symbolic subtext. And of course, Rutger Hucer, as the child-like Roy Batty, the philosophical leader of the six mercenary replicant, ruthless hoping to gain more longevity since a replicant has an expiration date and dies.
As mentioned before, life and death play a special part within the film. There are even forms of religious aspect. One example is the towering Tyrell Corporation, built as pyramids similar to the Egyptians. In one exterior scene, within the corporation, the sun rises up from the distance that implies god-like abilities. The opening sequence, an extreme close-up of a human’s eye (or possibly a replicant’s eye), lidless, looks out toward the hellish landscape. After Roy Batty dies, a dove is released from his grip as he is letting go his life. A prominent moment that leaves a viewer in deep question is the final sequence where Rachel and Deckard practically elope. Earlier in the film, Deckard dreams of a unicorn, in the last few moments of the film, Deckard finds an origami at his doorstep left by Gaff. Its shape is that of a unicorn; this could conclude that he is really a replicant, hence, memory implants.
Blade Runner is a master film. It contains the layers of society that begin to bewilder a new generation. In some vague sense, it tries to teach us of what would happen if we distort the world through world wars and polluting our environment so much that life would become so meaningless.
Conner Rainwater
3Jun10
An amazing film that gets better every time you see it. It is what Sci-Fi should be. I mean, you’ve got Harrison Ford as a detective who hunts down clones(replicants) for a living and Rutger Hauer as a psychotic Replicant who refuses to die.
The film addresses a number of issues, both philosophical and physical. It presents the viewer with a beautifully horrific future that is certainly plausible. The environmental damage to L.A. essentially makes it a giant piece of metal. It is overpopulated and full of crime and corruption. The crowded surrounding of the city makes it an almost claustrophobic experience. It is quite a bleak outlook and gives little hope for a better future.
While the landscape is a big part of the film, the plot suggests something deeper to examine. It questions the very essence of life. Who deserves the right to have freedom. The replicants appear to be just as hungry for individualism and freedom as humans. Their enslavement on foreign planets gives an interesting parallel to African American slavery. The Blade Runners act as a task force to hunt down and destroy the replicants that have escaped in the city. However, Harrison Ford’s Rick Deckard begins to see that they are not the evil he has believed them to be.
Ridley Scott gives us a final thought at the end as well, is Deckard a replicant. On a first thought it seems almost impossible. How could the protagonist and most relatable character be not a real human. Then you begin to question what it means to be human. Is it how we are born, our DNA or our lifespan. Maybe being human isn’t all that black and white.
- Currently 5.0/5 Stars.
kelvanE
4Nov09
I’m in the camp with David below — I just never got into it. Because it’s such a cult favorite and all, I specifically made a point to watch it again, this time the Director’s Cut, but, again, to no avail.
I find the movie unrelenting in its dark, dreary mood. There is literally no sunshine in the entire film, save the unicorn dream and the hilly ending. It wears me thin. But, I can’t hold that against it: surely the film scores a monumental achievement in the art direction/set design area. I simply love, love, love the look of the pale yellow and blue neon signs in the streets amidst the dirty fog, wet ground, and claustrophobic confinement. The interior and exterior of the “Eye Shop” looks so beautiful, I had to take screenshots for reference of great set design. So, I think for the completely dark cinematography, its flashes of pure color contrast and work well to give the location its ludicrous futuristic stamp.
All that beauty aside, the story never ropes me in. I cannot get into it, and, frankly, because Blade Runner is so pointed and auteur-driven, it acquires an aloof perpetuity that runs off and away from the viewer. It’s too serious. Or maybe, it struggles to appeal to the emotions. It feels far-off and cold.
It may seem a contradiction that David Lynch’s Eraserhead is one of my favorite films in this context. Eraserhead, however, has moments of humor to break it up into chunks, and it has a deeper, palatable shade of sadness that I can actually feel and experience. Blade Runner, in my opinion, is somewhat deadpan and flat.
Ridley Scott’s Alien is an excellent movie at any rate.
- Currently 2.0/5 Stars.
VENIMOS LOS JODIMOS Y NOS FUIMOS
13Oct09
El mas destacado logro hasta el momento en la carrera de Ridley Scott, y, seguramente, la mejor pelicula de los 80. No es aventurado decir esto. Blade runner es uno de esor raros, rarisimos casos, en que la adaptacion cinematografica de un libro (en este caso un relato corto de Philip. K. Dick) resultan ser mas desarrollados, mas complejos, en fin, mejores que el original literario. Ademas, la cinta de Scott es sin lugar a dudas una de las mas grandes influencias del cine americano posterior a su realizacion, por su deslumbrante estilo visual: una mezcla de los grandes escenarios de la Metropolis de Fritz lang, asi como un uso del barroquismo visual cinematorafico como no se habia visto desde Citizen Kane de Welles, y una influencia que perdura hasta nuestros dias, no solamente en peliculas, sino principalmente en videosde rock, lo que, lamentablemente, hacen que dicha influencia haya decaido en la mayoria de los casos en cliche: luces de neon que salen de todos lados, principalmente aquellas que se cuelan a traves de ventiladores andando, neblinita, vapor que escapa de alcantarillas, etc. Ridley Scott afirma que dicho estilo visual tiene una funcion simbolica en la cinta, esto es, la luz representa la perdida de la intimidad del ser humano, sin duda un concepto interesante, lo cual hace mas descorazonador el hecho de que el propio Scott se haya autofusilado su propio estilo en las cintas posteriores a su obra maestra de 1982 ( tanto en Someone watch over me ,como en Black Rain, la unica preocupacion del director parece ser el querer demostrar que el fue quien dirigio Blade Runner) lo cual no obsta para considerar a Scott como uno de los mejores estetas del cine actual. Clasico de la ciencia ficcion, filme de culto (culto como se entiende aquel de las grandes peliculas, o sea, ninguneadas y menospreciadas en su momento y despues, revaloradas y finalmente idolatradas, Blade runner es uno de esos filmes que sigue causando reacciones encontradas, tanto del lado de los que la consideran una de las mejores peliculas de todos los tiempos, como de aquellos que piensan que no va mas alla de ser un churro ciberpunk (el mismo Harrison Ford deplora hablar de la cinta, ya que, convertido en una superestrella por su papel de Han Solo como de Indiana Jones, su vision comercial del film chocaba abiertamente con el tono oscuro y vanguardista de Scott, al grado que, durante el rodaje, a punto estuvieron de agarrarse a chingadazos en repetidas ocasiones, por lo que Ford prefiere referirse a B.R. como “una cinta dificil” y no mas.), Blade Runner permanece como una portentosa experiencia audiovisual (la musica de Vangelis para este film tambien hizo historia) que no se puede dejar de ver.

- Currently 5.0/5 Stars.
Hideous Bitch Princess
6Aug09
Interesting, imaginative, entertaining, and brilliantly shot, this is the superlative science fiction film in my opinion. It seems the best way to maintain longevity in that particular genre is to put the audience in a situation which is relative to the direction society is headed in during that time (Metropolis, Terminator, Jurassic Park, Children of Men, etc.) Blade Runner does just that by creating a world which suggests that our efforts to make life more manageable consistently has the simultaneous consequence of making it more dynamically difficult. Then you need a good story which follows that subject matter while providing deeper layers regarding outside factors. Blade Runner has many of those as well. This is a film which can be watched with ease numerous times, and will reveal new elements to consider every time (plus it is exciting.) Lastly a good sci-fi film will need some bad ass special effects. Once again Blade Runner has them. But the special effects can hardly compare to the cinematography in this film, something which I found beautifully artistic. Everything from the shot composition, to the dark and dreary colors invaded by bright glowing textures, to the atmospheric lighting which was clearly influenced by German Expressionism and Noir. My only real complaint about this near masterpiece is the Hollywood style rapid editing which I found very out of place for the visual style of the film, compromising some of it’s aesthetic value. It makes me curious as to whether or not Ridley Scott had final cut on the picture. Nevertheless, I am kind of picky about things like that and if you don’t find it to be valid criticism then consider this movie flawless for what it is.
- Currently 4.0/5 Stars.
baddaboom
26May09
“I’ve done questionable things.”
We’re in the future. How often does that happen? No, really. Is Decker an android? The way he becomes more and more dehumanized as his blood hunt succeeds. The way the Androids become more and more human as they face their inevitable mortality. An interrogation that goes horribly bad over a turtle. Spotlights stabbing through the night. Two terrified clown dolls try not to make eye contact with the monster sitting next to them. An android who realizes her past is a programmed sham. A superman who revels in his last breaths about the wonders he’s seen that no human could ever imagine. A son who realizes his father has no answers.
More Baddaboom Reviews:
http://web.me.com/paddybon/Site/My_favorite_flicks.html
- Currently 4.0/5 Stars.
Brendan
16May09
Definitely not what I was expecting. The title promises quick action, but really it’s much more of a noir kind of film, and a much deeper film than you’d really expect.
It took me three full views of the Director’s Cut to really appreciate what Scott was doing, and I think it’s a really pretty awesome film. I’ve got to admit, though, it wasn’t until the second time through that I really liked it. All those awful preconceptions blocking me at the gate.
- Currently 4.0/5 Stars.
Justin Partridge
21Apr09
At one point, I owned about three seperate copies of this film. I had the first print with the horrible voice over, the director’s cut DVD (sans V.O.), and The Final Cut, released last Christmas. This is my favorite movie of all time, hands down. It is a perfect blending of Chandler-esque Neo-Noir, morality play and discussion on mortality, and mind-bending, dark Sci-fi. Nothing that I have seen in all my 20 years has come close to it.
- Currently 5.0/5 Stars.
Petr Stoniš
15Sep08
Simply I must admit that I adore the music Vangelis made for this movie and the sounds, the beeping etc. in every part of the picture which complement it sometimes even make the atmosphere in the movie itself without any music being present at the same time (guess it’s natural but still:) ) For me it is still the best music you can get while reading Mr. Dick’s books or any other cyberpunk. So moody styleless and post- modern!
- Currently 5.0/5 Stars.
jim www
6May08
Well this is the best film ever made as far as I am concerned and according to the American Cinematographers assn in the top ten of films ever made. Each frame could be put on someone’s wall and be art, photo. This is when photographers were running the camera – not videographers that went into film. The lighting is incredible. Art and design again – incredible. Too bad Holden’s scene was left out. I am shocked that on the final cut – Harrison bumps (t bones) into a cab while running for Zhora and smashes the glass in half and there is no sound of the glass breaking – incredible that they missed that on the restoration. Unique movie – last one ever made without CGI. Sometimes the film was rewound many, many time for double, triple, oct exposures on the film – very few would know how to do that today. This is truly a gift from Ridley to us.. (and the people who financed it)
- Currently 5.0/5 Stars.
Akira Kar-Wai
11Apr08
I didn’t really know what to expect with Blade Runner, the movie had been recut so many times it became confusing. But I finally saw the Final Cut version and it perfectly captures the feel of existential sci-fi such as Dark City and Solaris (either Tarkovsky’s or Soderbergh’s, I like both). This is a very underrated movie and the questions it raises of humanity in Artificial Intelligence and how the line between human and machine can be blurred with the advancement of such technology allows for serious thought-provoking cinema. The ambiguous ending I found deeply satisfying for the film’s overall feel and Harrison Ford is in his prime here. Watch it if only for Rutger Hauer’s final monologue on the nature of life.