Jonathan Cribbs
7Feb12
Uh, I'd argue that Hoffman is more often a pretty subtle actor. He's remembered for bigger performances, but look at his work in "Moneyball" or "Mission: Impossible III" or "Love Liza." Incredible range.
Philip seymour is amazing in this movie, or at least for me. I was baffled to the point that I couldent recognize that it was him. The story is what it is, its not invented or made up, its biografical, so cant really complain that someones life is sad, when infact it is sad, and made into a film. But even though once again Seymour did a fantastic job, fantastic.
I watched this, and Infamous, and I realize now that I really don't care for this story. Neither are good films.
Not a very good film. Worth seeing only for Keener's role. INFAMOUS was better.
For once Hoffman got a character that actually needed his hyper-realistic, over the top acting.
Uh, I'd argue that Hoffman is more often a pretty subtle actor. He's remembered for bigger performances, but look at his work in "Moneyball" or "Mission: Impossible III" or "Love Liza." Incredible range.
Personally, I prefer Infamous. There's an underlying sense of playfulness to Infamous that this movie lacks. Hoffman is fine as Capote, but it feels like an impersonation to me, whereas Toby Jones BECAME Capote, in my opinion. Also, I'm not sold on Keener's Lee. She's all schoolmarm and no feisty charm.
I think I have to revisit this film again because I didn’t pay any attention to Keener and I am surprised to know she was nominated for an Oscar for that performance. And Philip Seymour Hoffman is... the man for this.
So...for some folks to think Infamous was better because it got overlooked, I had to ask: WHY? This is one of those instances where the predecessor is already a doozy. And Bullock will never touch Keener as Harper Lee.Plus, there's Adam Kimmel. Great shout-out, Cremildo.
A perfect portrait of a man, and what a man, we feel as he feels and see all in unflinching detail, scarring and resonant. Like all great portraits, after the experience we feel we know their scars as well as we know our own, our first impressions are dashed, warped, turned over, hightened....and the truth isn't always easy to deal with.
The movie is ridiculously underrated because many dislike it for the fact that PSH won over Ledger for Lead Actor. Capote is a near perfect piece of cinema and Hoffman's performance is just as good or better than Ledger (even though Brady Corbet is my personal winner of 2005).
A horrendously overrated film, and the best performance is Catherine Keener's, not Philip Seymour Hoffman's.
Solid performance, directing, and cinematography. I prefer this movie to win Oscar's Best Picture, instead of Crash. Sorry...
I find it fascinating how intriguing and captivating this film is eventhough the main character is so hard to like and sympathise with. Bennett Miller paints a dark, grim portrait of the development of Truman Capote's book on a gruesome criminal case. The story is gripping in itself and the cast, led by Philip Seymour Hoffman, is outstanding.
Nearly perfect performances, but it doesn't have any visual beauties. The movie is as cold as the book "In cold blood". I just love the film since 2006! 5 stars out of 5.
Real, chilling, expertly crafted and led by its luminary performances, but I honestly can't think of one good reason to like this movie.
this film was alright. For some reason, I think I liked Infamous a lot better.
I was more knocked about by Catherine Keener as Harper Lee than by Hoffman. I absolutely believe her character whereas with Hoffman I was always aware of the performance. Really good performance that it was.
Philip Seymour Hoffman becomes Truman Capote! It's flooring. And the entire story is great to know.