Reviews of Children of Men
Displaying all 6 reviews
Hideous Bitch Princess
7Jan10
Total emancipation from oppression in the world lies not in government institutions, nor it’s radical opposition, but rather through redemption for the apathy exercised by otherwise good hearts. The point of view expressed by “Children of Men” is one that truly does cut directly to the core of many of the problems we as a society experience today. A poster on this site stated that Tarkovsky would be proud, and while I’m not sure if that’s necessarily true (he seemed to be impertinent and difficult to please), he along with true filmmaker / philosophers like Kubrick would have at least appreciated the films analyses of the situation presented as a whole, and revealing a balance, rather than picking an extreme side. 5 stars for one of my personal all-time favorites.
- Currently 5.0/5 Stars.
In An Expression Of The Inexpressible
26Aug09
Surely one of the strongest movies from the past few years dealing with the new face of facism that is ahead of us; with the supressed problematic of the refugees that will sooner or later become the new “enemy” of the developed Europe. It is an exact, straightforward and truthful display of where a crisis always leads – to totalitarism. The movie also displays some of the same practices now – the scene in the refugee camp with the Guantanamo look-a-like prisoners and the song “Arbeit macht frei” as a clear connection to the nazi concetration camps. It has a big statment. And further more, it is brilliantly shot. The use of the camera is so precise and with its long takes so in the happening that it grabs you and puts you next to Theo. The technique is similar to the movie Bloody Sunday, but at least a level better. It will make you think and it will leave you no hope.
- Currently 5.0/5 Stars.
John Smith
7Jul09
It’s an incredible film, I love it, this is one of the greatest films of 06’, it’s one of the greatest films of this decade, that’s saying a lot, but I absolutely love this film. The Cinematography is amazing, and you care about every single character, even the nd it feels like you are right next to smallest parts you feel for them. People comparing this to Blade Runner is wrong, it is evidently better than Blade Runner. You care about everyone who dies in the film, and you feel like you are right next to Clive Bowen through the entire film. It is one of the greatest films I’ve seen in a long, long, time; Cuaron does a stupendous job, he should have won the best picture of 06’, but of course the 150 year-old’s who run thee Academy didn’t give it to him, which is complete and absolute bullshit, I stopped giving a shit about what the academy had to say after this film being snubbed. To some it up on one word, Great
- Currently 5.0/5 Stars.
bristolcapristo
20Jun09
I just watched this movie for like the 500th time last evening, and each and every time I sit there completely stuck in my seat with my eyes glued to the screen. This movie if phenomenal, and whomever disagrees should burn. Seriously, how did this movie not become a huge blockbuster hit? Each and every detail is orchestrated beautifully and with harmony to the overall story and picture. Clive Owen in this movie is fucking amazing. Nobody could have played that role better than him. Top 3 movies of all time for me.
- Currently 5.0/5 Stars.
Chad Ossman
17Jun09
Alfonso Cuarón’s Children of Men is absolutely one of the best movies I’ve ever seen. Two viewings have overwhelmed me with some of the strongest emotional reactions I’ve ever had to a movie. It is, at the very least, one of the best of 2007 (along with Pan’s Labyrinth and United 93), and everything the similarly-themed V for Vendetta could have been.
The movie opens nearly two decades after the last human birth. Mass infertility is a terrifyingly plausible sci-fi trope in 2008, with looming climate catastrophe, increased rates of autism and allergies, and the imminent threat of a globe-spanning contagious disease outbreak like SARS (a fictional flu pandemic is alluded to in the film). As the infertility remains uncured, so too is it unexplained for the audience. The best science fiction avoids pedestrian pseudo-science that tends not to date well (2001: A Space Odyssey being the exception that proves the rule). The most detail we learn is that women are infertile, and we can assume that cloning and artificial insemination of frozen eggs have failed. So by the time the film opens, the harsh fact that the human race is doomed to slowly die out is a given, and has reduced the world’s societies into chaos. Only Britain has been able to survive, to a point, using only the harshest totalitarian methods. In propaganda commercials glimpsed throughout the movie, Britain congratulates itself for the fascism that makes it possible to carry on; but is this kind of survival worth the price?
Immigrants flood the only country with some semblance of stability, fleeing unspecified atrocities abroad. All we learn of the United States is of a vague catastrophe in New York creepily referred to only as “it.” Immigrants are demonized as “fugis” (for “fugitives,” perhaps punning on the derogatory British slang “paki” for any and all Middle Easterners) and penned in concentration camps. Many shots explicitly allude to infamous images of captive enemy combatants in Guantanamo Bay. Several of the fugitive voices we hear are German, causing one to wonder just what exactly may have happened in Germany, and if it may have been something we have seen before in human history. My German is non-existent, but If I’m not mistaken, we overhear one captive German woman bitterly complain to her guard for being locked up in a detention cell with black people. It’s not a pretty picture of human nature, that at the worst of times, the worst of us comes out.
The five credited screenwriters, usually a bad sign, have done an extraordinary job of adapting the original novel by P.D. James (who, according to IMDB, has an uncredited cameo in the café bombed in the opening moments of the film). I don’t know if I would go so far as to say the movie is “better” than its source material, but it is certainly more visceral and emotionally affecting to a post 9/11 audience. As an adaptation, the many changes are justified and benefit the translation to a different medium and time. Most significantly, the chronology is condensed from months to days, and the relatively polite insurrectionist group The Five Fish has become a full-fledged terrorist organization called simply The Fish. Theo (Clive Owen) is younger, and no longer living a life of wealthy ease. He’s a gambler and alcoholic, and his original motivation to help The Fish is raw money. His cousin Nigel (Danny Huston) is not the all-powerful Warden of England of the book, but rather merely the effete guardian of the Ark of the Arts. King Crimson’s dramatic Mellotron dirge “In the Court of the Crimson King” fittingly accompanies Theo as he visits Nigel, passing into a walled city that separates the privileged elite from the working masses outside (Naomi Klein predicts the future dominance of such places in the DVD bonus features). The Ark is a pointless quest to archive the world’s great works of art, including everything from Michelangelo’s David, Picasso’s Guernica, to Pink Floyd’s inflatable pig.
Several mind-bendingly impossible tracking shots grace the film, so fluid and justified by the action that the mind barely registers a lack of cutting. There is an incredible level of detail in the art direction, but as Cuaron declares in the DVD bonus features, the goal to was be the “anti-Blade Runner.” Two decades hence, technology has marched on only to a degree. What’s the point of innovation in fashion, automobiles, and consumer electronics when the human race is doomed to extinction? Eerie sights include fields of burning cattle corpses (possibly due to mad cow disease, or more likely the simple fact that the farming economy has collapsed), abandoned and crumbling schools, and the prominence of dog racing as the sport of choice in a world with fewer and fewer fit young people every day.
Children of Men may be a punishingly bleak vision of the future, but there is hope to be had. Theo is a broken man resolved to a slow death, both his own and of his species. But there is something special within him; his former lover Julian (Julianne Moore) trusts him over everyone else to do the right thing when presented with a gift of hope: the first human child in two decades. Even animals are drawn to him, including dogs, kittens, and deer. His friend Jasper (Michael Caine) praises the Hindu Peace Mantra, which also appears as an epigram after the credits (over the sound of children playing), and bears repeating here: Shantih Shantih Shantih
(originally published on my blog: http://www.thedorkreport.com/2008/08/29/children-of-men-2)
jaredmobarak
9Jun09
Alfonso Cuarón has been a must-see director for me since his Spanish-language Y tu mamá también. Following that gem with the best Harry Potter film yet, I couldn’t wait until he delved into adult material again. I got my wish this year with the dystopic drama Children of Men. Although I have been waiting months to see the film based on its trailer, I couldn’t help but be disappointed by how much that tease gave away. I remember that no matter how engrossing the visuals and music were in that two-minute clip, I could not shake the feeling I had just seen the entire film condensed. Thankfully, after finally seeing it (hopefully it will make it to Buffalo soon so I can catch the amazing cinematography on the big screen), I can say that the trailer really just shows the tip of the iceberg for what will happen. Not only does it deceive in a good way, it hides the real emotional journey that the movie takes.
In twenty years our world will be on a steady road to manmade Armageddon. For the last eighteen years, women have been unable to conceive a child and this horror has allowed countries to go on a rampage to try and preserve their own ideals, as every day is a day closer to extinction. Wars are raging everywhere and it seems only Britain has been able to fortify itself to try and sustain what life is left for the small hope of survival. Refugees from all around the globe have tried to seek asylum in England, but are turned away or housed in detention camps until they can be disposed of. A group of insurgents, the Fishes, are trying to combat with the government’s harsh policies of immigration, however, their war just begins a more rapid extermination of humanity as bombs and bullets fly throughout the streets. Maybe the bombs are acts of terrorism by the rebels, maybe they are set by the government to instill fear against the insurgents; either way the world has been shattered behind recognition.
Clive Owen plays a former activist named Theo who has lost faith in the causes he used to live to defend. He works a menial job and longs for the visits to the countryside with an old friend Jasper, (played wonderfully out-of-character by Michael Caine), to hold onto a small sliver of what life used to be. When kidnapped by the Fishes, led by his ex-wife (the stalwart Julianne Moore) whose own faith in the cause has multiplied since the same event which dissolved Owen’s, he becomes a part of what could be the miracle that will save the world. His involvement in this mission doesn’t as much reinvigorate his belief in doing what he thinks is right as instead shake him from the meaningless life he’s lived these past years, awakening him from his debilitating self-loathing. He is able to see first-hand the atrocities being committed and decides to put his life at risk for this young woman who’s miraculous pregnancy could save the world. Theo doesn’t do it for mankind; he keeps his goals closer to home. In saving this woman’s life, so her baby can live, he might be able to forgive himself for the life chance has created.
Owen is superb and he needs to be. Theo is in practically every scene as Cuarón has decided on using a cinema verite style staying close by in a fly-on-the-wall capacity. As an audience, we are thrust into the action as it happens all around our hero and ourselves. The singular vision Cuarón has successfully attempted here is unfathomable. There are multiple instances where we are treated to long takes lasting from five to ten minutes at a time. (I read an article that these shots are in fact digital composites bridged together to appear seamless; even so, the accomplishment is astonishing) One sequence towards the middle of the film has us inside a car with four characters. We spin 360 degrees around the interior in order to stay up on the conversation throughout and once the car comes under attack by savages, the view still doesn’t break until after the car finally stops and the camera gets out to view the roadside. Whether you end up liking the movie or not, you must appreciate the technical achievement that went into it.
Along with the fantastic visual flair and top-notch performances is the simple yet profound story structure. Like Cuarón did with Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, (having almost everything from the novel somewhere in the background), he gives the audience the benefit of the doubt. He understands that the medium of film is not the same as a book. With film we can see the descriptions and events occurring as though we are a part of the action; there is nothing more I hate then a character explaining something to someone that already knows for the sake of us, the viewers, being totally aware in case we missed extrapolating it for ourselves in the scene before. Does it matter where the troops are coming from? Does it matter what scientists are doing to find a cure? Why are babies no longer able to be born? None of these questions need to be systematically answered as the true story is of a man finding a reason to live again and his quest to save his young friend and her child. Less is definitely more and Cuarón truly understands how to mold cinema into giving us the answers we need without spoon-feeding. The brilliant performances by Chiwetel Ejiofor, Peter Mullan and especially Claire-Hope Ashitey are enhanced by the fact we know little of their past. We know just as much as Theo and therefore can relate to his actions rather than second-guessing everyone’s motives because we know more than the protagonist. We experience it all along with the characters on screen. Cuarón is not telling a story that has happened, but instead allowing us to be a part of what’s happening right now.
- Currently 5.0/5 Stars.