Poet and hero of the American counter-culture, Jonas Mekas, born in Lithuania in 1922, invented the diary form of film-making. Walden, his first completed diary film, an epic portrait of the New York avant-garde art scene of the 60s, is also a groundbreaking work of personal cinema. —Re-Voir
“Jonas Mekas’ films celebrate life. They rise up against the world’s overwhelming commercialism, attempting instead to revive the pleasures of friendship, a first snowfall or the return of Spring. Mekas’s genius stems from his generously including the viewer in his vision of the world, allowing us to (re)discover, in a simple image, the incredible force and necessity of poetry.” —Yann Beauvais
Jonas Mekas was born in 1922 in Semeniskiai, Lithuania. He currently lives and works in New York. In 1944, Jonas Mekas and his brother, Adolfas, were taken by the Nazis and imprisoned in a forced labor camp in Nazi Germany for eight months. After the War, he studied philosophy at the University of Mainz from 1946-48 and at the end of 1949, he emigrated with his brother to the U.S. settling in Williamsburg, Brooklyn in New York. Two weeks after his arrival, he borrowed the money to buy his first Bolex 16-mm camera and began to record moments of his life. He discovered avant-garde film at venues such as Amos Vogel’s pioneering cinema 16, and he began screening his own films in 1953. He has been one of the leading figures of American avant-garde filmmaking or the “New American Cinema,” as he dubbed it in the late ‘50s, playing various roles: in 1954, he became editor and chief of Film Culture; in 1958 he began writing his “Movie Journal” column for the Village Voice; in 1962 he co-founded… read more
Walden could well be the first diary film with many lovely scenes from Mekas' times, but the film does not make me think much. One of the narrating texts is 'RABBIT SHIT'. I can understand why he indulged himself in making this, seemingly a film opposing consumerism. However, it is frustratingly cut and it really becomes ugly in its self-importance.
"What is the difference between a ‘filmer’ and a filmmaker? Me, I just film my life. I have no plan, no script. I have no idea what I will do with the footage. But filmmakers usually have a script, have an idea, want to make a film. They know, more or less, what that film will be and what they want it to be. They collect material to make that film. I consider they are filmmakers; they make films. They have a program, they have a plan, an idea. I don’t have. I just film."* Pretty much the exact opposite of self-important... No?
I guess you are right and you have made me think differently of the film by repeating what the director said. He was just filming his life. But why should we care? The film isn't really enjoyable to watch. At least, I did not care. Some of it was heartwarming. But what I disliked most about the film was how it was so frustratingly cut. He did not need to include everything in his film, but instead he has cut it so it is very difficult to watch.
How bourgeois. As I was watching this I had violent fantasies of a society where artists were persecuted for playing the part of artists. If these are only unassuming personal images, why impose a waltz over footage of a wedding?
"And all cinema — including Hollywood — reflects reality. In fact, sometimes the worse the film the more it reflects real life." Jonas Mekas