Winner of the 1964 Golden Bear at the Berlin Film Festival, Dry Summer is a tense story of love and betrayal with wonderful performances throughout. It speaks of greed through the microcosmic Osman, whilst presenting an allegorical argument against the capitalist ideal. Tender, violent and superbly written.
Metin Erksan is one of the leading profiles in Turkish Cinema. Susuz Yaz-Dry Summer is one of his most important works.
A fairly interesting movie...Although it wasn't exceptional, the movie has some strong points...Osman - an incredibly vivid character, due to his sense of possession and greed. Some interesting choices regarding the director's techniqe and an interesting way of portraying eroticism.
Masterpiece. Not plot points, but plot images. Perfect cinema. There's a single shot that elevates it beyond everything else - a camera rolls in the green fields, round and round like a grieving woman. Except the woman is standing up.
The story is a good one, and would have been poignant if not for the quality of the acting, which was a little unconvincing. Osman's brother and sister-in-law seemed to tolerate all his scheming, pervy little ways without question, which is odd. Interesting though, except for the scene where the dog was shot, which I (a modern day, softy vegetarian) found a bit disturbing, but I guess the 60s were a different time
Beautiful movie with a powerful storyline. Like "Toni", by Jean Renoir, it is an intense loving triangle story. The conflict about water is universal and present.
Relly fine movie. Great story, intense climax and fantastic cinematography. Seems simple but is complex and the characters are really well defined.
Fine restoration, thank Scorsese's World Cinema Foundation. In the vengeance genre, this one ain't too shabby.
Akin is super right, camera use is very poor in most turkish films. Use of sound is also successfull.
The camera work of Ali Uğur is really way beyond its time regarding other Turkish films of this period. A Masterpiece!
Loved the raw look at the unsophisticated emotional life of the 'real' people; absorbing without being 'studious'!
We're very fortunate that Scorsece's foundation was able to preserve such a captivating movie. Lush in its aesthetics, and exhilarating in its tensions and climax. I'm certainly watching this one again and again.
thanks to Scorsese's world cinema foundation and Fatih Akin's pick for restoring this movie,it looked great at the MOMA and should be seen in a theater. we should not buy into computerization of the medium and the experience.