although the movie is entertaining for the eye and it's narrations are seldom interesting, it is so disoriented that I couldn't see what the hell the point of the movie was.
A movie I grew up watching. When I was young, I loved the extremes and comedy, but as I get older I love the two monologues he does about the sixties as he sits somberly in the empty hotel rooms savaged by his attorney.
This movie is so cool! This is bat country, we can't stop here. <a href="http://pilatesoefeningen.net/">Pilates oefeningen</a>
Such an awsome movie. Really enjoyed watching it and compare it to my experience
one of the movies the script of which you'd like to read on your own with high probability of putting one of the phrases of it on your wall in front of the desk. so that you can always remind yourself that we all actually live in a fear and loathing of las vegas.
The ultimate midnight movie? Although Terry Gilliam's film was critically panned, lambasted, and generally torn apart by critics, the cult audience who generally "gets" the film (there are only a select and special few who actually "get" this sort of experience) made it a success later on. For all of its incredibly outrageous psychedelic excesses, this film is the best depiction and dissection of the death of the American dream as idealized by the 1960s.
chaotically poignant; has something to say, and there is always something to pay attention to on-screen. it's sort of intoxicating to watch. great film, but it could've been perfected by adding in more of the reflective scenes w/ Raoul/Hunter that were in the book
Pogleda ga ponovo po ko zna koji put, nesto je u ovom filmu sta je meni presmisno kroz cili film ... var ipo
criminally underrated. Gilliam establishes a tone that perfectly nails Hunter S Thompson's aesthetic.
A movie that spent two hours repeating the same joke over and over again. It was sorta funny the first time you heard the joke, and it was not funny the second time or the time after that. The performances are nothing notable either. Johnny Depp's characters does the same thing for the entire movie and has no levels to him. He is completely flat. I have seen this multiple times, each time I hate it more and more.
Terry Gilliam is the acid-fuled equivilant of Wes Anderson when it comes to Vegas. Like the American dream, it'll never die.
Well, all I can say is that I've taken a few years to accept watching it, and I don't regret, I knew I would be disappointed anyway. The movie is typical from Gilliam : too many details, lack of structure etc... Ok, there might be something interesting and the effects of drugs on the protagonists are realistic, but I was just bored. I think I need a solid narrative frame to like a movie.