Welcome to MUBI.
Your online cinema. Anytime, anywhere.

Reviews of Fox and His Friends

Displaying all 2 reviews

back to Fox and His Friends

Picture of Seen Said

Seen Said

17Feb12

Rainer Werner Fassbinder, the notoriously bleak and skeptical filmmaker within Germany’s intriguing and tumultuous film history, creates a melodramatic allegory of trust and deception with Fox and His Friends. He was one of the most prominent figures in the New German Cinema, a collective that adopted the Oberhausen Manifesto of 1962 that was a formal declaration by young German filmmakers to establish a “new German feature film”, for “the old cinema is dead, and we believe in the new cinema.” They outwardly rejected funding from Germany’s pre-existing film industry in favor of independence, avoiding any studio mandates that would guarantee its commercial investment at the expense of artistic expression. However critical he was of his own country’s bourgeois ways and the surging capitalist ethic of post-war West Germany, Fassbinder was not dead-set on leaving the old cinema behind like his fellow contemporaries. He, in fact, aimed for a reconciliation of sorts between the styles of the past and the content of his present. It’s no wonder he manifested a deep appreciation of theater director Bertolt Brecht, another German artist also interested in “re-functioning” his own medium for a new use of sociopolitical commentary. Fassbinder’s greatest strength as a filmmaker was in showing the social hypocrisies of post-war Germany using their traditional cinematic style to serve more modern, social concerns (Douglas Sirk, another German-born filmmaker and significant influence on Fassbinder, worked in Hollywood using this same approach). Fassbinder belonged to a nation that at the time had this clash between tradition and modernism built right into itself, a country divided between the East’s stubborn cling to a fading socialism and the West’s haste to escape the country’s troubled World War II past through economic reform.

Fox and His Friends opens on a vagrant showman and occasional prostitute named Franz (his nickname “Fox” emblazoned in rhinestones across his jean jacket) whose casual boyfriend has just been arrested for their illegal street circus performance. Briefly forced back into hooking, Franz meets Max while on the job, an antique dealer who offers him a ride to purchase a fateful, winning lottery ticket, sealing their introduction into something more momentous than a casual pick-up. Now with half a million suddenly in his corner, Franz is quickly introduced to Max’s group of elitist and materialistic homosexual fast friends, men who take an immediate liking to Franz, or rather to the sweet smell of new money he exudes. He falls in love with Max’s young friend Eugen, the urbane, upper middle class son of a fledgling business owner. Eugen is more than eager in returning a false love to gain proximity to Franz’s monetary prize, quickly persuading him to purchase a condo to live in together, unashamedly furnishing “their” apartment in tawdry, extravagant decor, and bloating his own wardrobe of ostentatious neckties and suits even further. Eugen’s true kiss of death (and Franz’s dumbest oversight) is deceiving him into investing his remaining riches behind the nearly bankrupt family business, precisely the opportunity Eugen was looking for. For Franz, this is a seemingly fortuitous chance at a happier life offering connections to a bourgeois lifestyle. Of course, all Eugen’s attempts to groom Franz’s working-class roughness into snobbish elegance never take, his imposed cultural “refinement” and forced affinity to the upper echelon only serving his own materialist visage. You can’t teach an old tramp new tricks, and as Eugen’s feigned emotional interest in Franz begins to strain thin, so does his family business’ ability to stay afloat, inevitably absorbing the last of the lottery winnings and rendering Franz useless. Thanks to a series of hastily-signed contracts forfeiting over property rights, Eugen is finally able to dump Franz and return to his old lover, who moves into the newly possessed condo even quicker than Eugen did.

Through the relationship between these two very different men in Fox and His Friends, Fassbinder finds a fresh and uncommon story to illustrate his thematic preoccupation with exploitation. The film belongs to his most fruitful period of production from 1968 until 1976, in which most of his films depicted a multitude of ways unscrupulous people get what they want and need. Youth and beauty wrangled a trophy lifestyle from a washed-up, lonely fashion designer in The Bitter Tears of Petra von Kant (1972), drunken beatings kept an alcoholic fruit vendor’s wife in check in The Merchant of Four Seasons (1971), and the racist undercurrent in post-war Germany stifled the love and fulfillment of a misused Moroccan immigrant in Ali: Fear Eats the Soul (1974). In this film, Fassbinder queers the usual paradigm of the gold digging woman exploiting a man’s wealth by giving us a mostly middle class gay man who exploits the gullibility and sudden wealth of a working class gay man. Far more cleverly, he depicts within a single love affair a swelling capitalist Germany’s exploitation of the working class even at the hands a middle class. Eugen and his struggling entrepreneurial family represent the accelerated, unethical pace at which West Germans wanted to advance their national identity beyond socialism. They know the game, and they know Franz doesn’t. Franz is also not a bright or discerning individual, a man dictated by his heart who does not know the ins and outs of business ventures, but only the ins and outs of the streets. Like most people focused on the immediate dollar and not a lifetime of wealth, he fails miserably at sustaining a comfortable lifestyle and ends up far worse off than before the winning lottery ticket.

Rainer Werner Fassbinder’s films have a deliberate social function, aiming to critique the shifting landscape of German film production and the politics informing it. His distrust of these burgeoning economics is really what constitutes the moral tale of Fox and His Friends, a lesson showing the pursuit of status and wealth usually corrodes relationships and sincerity. If money changes everything, it seldom does so for the better in those who’ve never had it. At the very least, _Fox and His Friends _is an impeccable portrait of anomie, a common side-effect felt by those with adjacency to a newfound jackpot. “If only I could win the lottery” is a common phrase uttered by us all, a wish that almost never takes into account how such a windfall would guarantee the unmasking of everyone in our lives’ ugly side, and perhaps the breakdown of our own self-regulatory values. Although winning the lottery is nearly every paean’s fantasy, it rarely registers as a daydream come true, but instead a burdensome nightmare.

  • Currently 3.0/5 Stars.
Picture of H. K. ‡

H. K. ‡

30Jan10

From the opening strains of lilting carnival music, set against a colorful fairground swarming with people, there’s no doubt about Fassbinder’s goal in this film: To show the insanity and the depravity of the world in all its hectic disgrace. This extended metaphor smoothly gives way to the story, as Klaus, Fox’s manager and boyfriend, is arrested, we meet Fox’s drunken sister, Fox meets Max, Fox wins the lottery and Fox makes his notorious friends. All these events happen in rapid succession, but when the plot slows down a little Fox has a new lover: Eugen, a slick, highbrow conman. Fox doesn’t realize it at the time, but when he utters the words “There’s no one that can’t be had” Eugen agrees completely, albeit in silence. Eugen proceeds to take Fox on a ride, milking him for money to save his father’s failing company, a posh apartment and the furniture for it, fancy clothes, a vacation to Morocco and a car. Fox loses everything and kills himself, but that’s to be expected in a Fassbinder film.

The irony in the U.S. title, Fox and His Friends is two-fold. His old friends, the ones who hang out in the bar he frequents, the ones who are down to earth and genuine, are the same ones he no longer has any use for. His new friends, the ones who are well cultured, the ones who make fun of him behind his back and criticize him to his face, the ones who fleece him for every penny he has, are the ones he can’t get himself away from. The lives of Fox’s friends from both sides get tangled together as they all watch Fox sink lower and lower and do nothing to help him. Fox and His Friends is a good enough title for this film, but the original title Faustrecht der Freiheit (Right Fist of Freedom in English) is much more telling. Fox wants to be happy, and happiness is freedom, but he is far too vulnerable and trusting to attain either in the world he’s living in. A world where no one is trustworthy and, worse than that, everyone is amoral and selfish. The characters in this movie are all involved a metaphorical fist fight where only the strong survive, where only those who are willing to connive, cheat, trick and steal are going to come out on top.

Just like in life, no one in this film is entirely sympathetic, once you get to know them. Fox is the most likable character, but even he has questionable morals. This aspect of the film is highlighted in Fox and Eugen’s first conversation where Fox declares that there are three types of people in the world: Those who are clean, those who wash and those who stink no matter how much they wash themselves. He goes on to say that the latter is okay because some people like a little stink. This declaration of humanity sums up what Fassbinder is trying to say in this film and many more. The statement is matched by the visual fragmentation of the characters, who, rarely shown in the whole, are instead fragmented by stray objects, windowpanes or mirrors. The scenes of the fair, the boutiques, the bars and Morocco are all lies as Fassbinder lays these colorful settings under truth after truth about the drab and mundane world in which we live. In the end, Max and Karl, representing the best of each of Fox’s groups of friends, find Fox dead from doctor prescribed sleeping pills in a subway station and decide to leave him there because they don’t want to get involved.

At first it seems that Fassbinder has nothing good to say about human nature. That people are bad and Fox, the world weary victim, is an exception to the rule. But if Fox is an exception, couldn’t there be other exceptions too? Surely Fox isn’t one of a kind. After all, he’s not a very exceptional person. Ultimately the message here is bittersweet, that one can be happy, but they have to fight for it with their life. Fox takes it one step further and sacrifices his life for happiness. Or rather, because of his lack of it in life.

  • Currently 5.0/5 Stars.