Two seemingly well-educated young men, who call each other Paul and Peter among other names, approach a family on vacation. They are, apparently, friends of the neighbors, and, at the beginning, their true intentions are not known. But soon, the family is imprisoned and tortured in its own house violently, which the viewers are forced mostly to imagine and to share a certain complicity with the criminals. It might be some kind of game with the lives of husband, wife, son, and dog, but why are they doing it? –IMDb
Cheerfully wishing his audience a “disturbing evening” at a London retrospective of his films, director Michael Haneke insists that he is an optimist at heart, despite all of the relentlessly bleak carnage and deeply disturbing imagery so vividly painted and seared into the mind of anyone who has had the uncomfortable experience of viewing his work.
Practically born into show business, to an actress mother and director father, in Munich in March 1942, Haneke spent his early years in a working class suburb of Vienna before an early attempt at fame as an actor and pianist. Failing to achieve early success, Haneke attended the University of Vienna to study philosophy and psychology, and became a film critic and stage director before making his eventual debut as a television director with After Liverpool in 1973. Setting in motion a television career specializing in literary adaptations and small screen films, Haneke would work successfully in that medium until his feature debut… read more
I think this is a film that is clearly much more rewarding in contemplation after viewing what happened and why, rather then actually being entertained by it. it's torture for most and should be. It's masochistic in terms of cinema... you won't realize you enjoyed it until after digesting it thoroughly. I assume the remake lacked this approach; a horror film with no happy ending. I won't be seeing that any time soon.
Even though there is very little graphic violence actually onscreen, this film is almost unendurable. But it offers so much to think about afterwards. It is one of those movies, like Peeping Tom, that doesn't let its audience off the hook. I can certainly understand why so many people hate this movie. That may be proof of how on-target it is.
"As is the case with several films in this year's New York Film Festival, Michael Haneke's The White Ribbon exemplifies the pleasures and
Michael Haneke es uno de esos directores de cine difíciles de analizar. Algunos llaman a su obra como suprema y definen el cine con sus películas. Otros, lo consideran un director algo sobrevalorado… read review
Funny Games is a movie that leaves nobody neutral. When you come around movie forums, it’s a«love it or hate it» kind of movie. Altought the difficult nature of the subject, the «graphic» nature… read review
Well I think its commenting on people’s obsession with violence. Between movies, TV, and more importantly the news people use violence as a form of entertainment. They have for thousands of years… read review
I’ve been meaning to write a review for Michael Haneke’s Funny Games since rewatching it Halloween night. I had seen it for the first time around 3-4 years ago on IFC and was blown away by its inventiveness… read review