Reviews of I Was Born, But...
Displaying all 4 reviews
Jon
30Mar12
An exemplary display of Ozu’s deft comic timing, as well as his characteristic grace and humanity. Despite being a fairly early entry in the director’s oeuvre, this silent film feels stunningly modern. This may be partially owed to its slick editing and loose, gliding camera, but nothing impresses more than the affectionately drawn child protagonists, acted so precisely and intuitively by Hideo Sugawara and Tomio Aoki. The ways in which Ozu captures the little moments between them, their father, or their school peers is an object lesson in behavioral observation, whether it’s in the humor of one boy always forgetting to zip his fly or how, by inherited synchronicity, the brothers fondly repeat each other’s actions. Weaving in pointed social commentary and always keeping the focus on the boys’ changing, bittersweet attitudes towards family and society, I Was Born, But… is a sterling, unassuming gem.
- Currently 4.0/5 Stars.
jimmylorunning
15Nov09
A beautifully shot comedy and tragedy rolled into one. It’s one thing when an adult is disillusioned, but it’s a whole nother level of sad when a little kid is. This movie portrays a small moment in the two sons of a salaryman’s life, their dealing with bullies at the new school, and their observations of the adult world. It’s poignant; you can see how these very simple events affected them, signifying their entry into an adult world. An aside: I don’t think there is a single Ozu movie without a train in it.
- Currently 5.0/5 Stars.
Rodney Welch
2Jan09
Yasuhiro Ozu’s early silent comedy about how children encounter the class system is surprisingly fresh and enduring, even if it does creak a little with age. Two young boys, whose father has transferred to a new job, start life at a new school and immediately run into trouble with bullies. They try to avoid confrontation either by skipping school, hiding behind their father, getting a local beer salesman to serve as their tough guy, or ultimately taking their own chances in a fight.
As with most children, self-esteem has a lot to do with family status, and a chance event shows them that the father they look up to is, also, a man who has to scrape and bow before people who are more important, like the father of one of their classmates. Their father suddenly seems to them a fool, and alters their sense of who they are; the father, likewise, finds himself hoping his boys grow up to become something more than “an apple-polisher like me.”
Ozu tended to focus on people middle aged and older, calmly observing the inevitable stages of life — work, marriage, getting ahead, death — and the inevitable sense of decline that comes as goals are put off and illusions are shattered with each passing year. Although this is one of the few to focus specifically on children — another is the late-career “Good Morning!” — it shows that his themes were already very much in place, particularly how our sense of who we are as adults is shaped by childhood. It bears the subtitle “A Picture Book for Adults”; as with any family scrapbook, it offers both a lot of fond memories and a melancholy bite.
- Currently 4.0/5 Stars.
asuraf
1Dec08
Yasujiro Ozu’s most fondly remembered silent film, and one of his most cinematic, this funny and bittersweet family comedy about two young brothers who lose faith in their working-class father when they see him playing the fool in an innocent office filmstrip, served as the basis for the director’s own Technicolor “Good Morning”, two and a half decades later. In the latter film the boys play the silent treatment after their father refuses to buy them a new TV, here it’s a hunger strike when they realize their father’s position as the subordinate to the father of one of their school friends, who they feel superior to; both films deal predominately with the struggles of a father to please his growing and ever critical children, but given the enormous gap in time between the projects, including the devastation of the war, it’s interesting to note how innocent the earlier film plays compared to the stark capitalist satire of the latter. Most Ozu buffs prefer the silent film to it’s late life remake, not just because it comes from a time when Ozu was still experimenting with a moving camera and looser editing style that he all but abandoned after the war, but because it so joyously revels in the livelihood of school kids – fighting with bullies, feeding sparrow eggs to the dog to spell a playground myth, ditching class and forging a homework assignment – before coming to its more dramatic family resolutions. Of all the great directors, nobody remade his own work better than Ozu, he did it many times and often both films are exemplary, such is the case here; “Good Morning” serves its purpose at a time and era when Ozu was winding down and critical of Japan’s post-war westernization, but here he was just building his style and reputation – the film won the prestigious Kinemo Jumpo award for Best Film of the year, the first, but not the last time Ozu would be so honored.
- Currently 5.0/5 Stars.