Tyler Aikens
25Jul11
....really?
At first i didn't like it, then i didn't care for it, then i gave it another chance, and now i love it. Some might argue Miike contradicts himself with his critique of cinematic violence by going over the top with it, but i think that's exactly the point. There's also a bunch of fantastic sequences, so even if you don't quite like the concept, it's hard to hate a movie with vampires, samurais, yakuzas among others.
Close to the most violent and most bizarre film I have ever seen only to come from the mind of Miike, an endless series of violence that leads to a heap trip worth watching for "the" serious international cult film buff but also Miike at his best.
A sort of fantasia on Japan's obsession with graphic violence and samurai culture; the film tries to critique how the image of violence is manipulated in the service of cynical interests, not least those of the entertainment industry. To me, it's a mess, not least because it wallows in the violence it seems to condemn. But the biggest compliment I can pay is that perhaps only a Syberberg could have got away with it.
A film which actually earns the adjective "insane". Miike's grand experiment (or perhaps jest), where he throws everything out there in an attempt to capture atrocity and hatred itself. Is this Miike's reflection on the 20th century? Either way, the violence transcending time, the endless cycle, leads to perhaps his most philosophically dense film. Essential 21st century cinema.
this film is actually deeper than wat most of the miike films seems to delineate. I had quite a bit of respect for this piece.
This is THE CRAZIEST THING I HAVE EVER SEEN! It's like a madman's insanity projectile vomited onto a screen.
By far and wide, Takashi Miike's most convoluted and pretentious piece that I have seen so far. Not his worst, but not far from it either.