A few surprising touches single out this early Kubrick film from other B-movies. However, these hardly make up for what is otherwise a film with a very simple and clichéd plot. The film is still worth a viewing, though, simply because it is one of Kubrick's first, which contains tiny inklings of his greater and later genius.
Filled with noir iconography captured by the eye of a young Stanley Kubrick. There are so many purely photographic moments that show a real affection for the genre's tropes. The plot is extremely convoluted, as most film noirs deliberately are, but I found myself being really drawn in by the visuals. The contrasty black-and-white cinematography is beautiful even if the film itself is a little rough around the edges.
Not Kubrick's best, for sure: Wonderfully shot but lacking rhythm. The characters are somehow kind of plain, cliché and not relatable. The sreenplay its not amazing also. It seems like it has all Kubrick's vocabulary in it already but very raw and not used in the best way. And what the f*** about that ending?!
Definitely not Kubrick's best. the plot are pretty standard for a film of Kubrick. Nice B & W cinematography though
Killer's Kiss 1955 DIR Stanley Kubrick PROD Stanley Kubrick SCR Stanley Kubrick DP Stanley Kubrick ED Stanley Kubrick 67 Min _Can happiness buy you money?_ it worked for Kubrick....
This film is endlessly underrated! This is actually a pretty great movie, not perfect, but far from the amateur seal it is currently given.
Kubrick's noirish second film. great story and performers. a short, fun and bold little gem.