Welcome to MUBI.
Your online cinema. Anytime, anywhere.

Reviews of Lawrence of Arabia

Displaying all 6 reviews

back to Lawrence of Arabia

Picture of deepdarksouth

deepdar​ksouth

28Aug09

Upon telling several friends that I had plans to view this four hour-long epic, they sighed, telling me that it was too long and tedious to possibly be enjoyable. (I guess this is just the standard web 2.0 mentality..?)

Ironically enough, there is something pleasurable about settling in to watch such an extensive film; one loses sense of time while taking in clever bits of dialogue and theme that she would have missed otherwise. While Lawrence of Arabia is a fantastic film, I would not want to view this more than once — I’d rather not crucify that magical element through objective analysis.

  • Currently 4.0/5 Stars.

MR. Univers​e

9Aug09

The film is so grand in scope, That you can’t help but be swept away by it. Even it’s running time is long. There is little subtlety in this film everything seems larger then life including it’s theme.

It’s nice to see legendary actors true talents of there time working together on a project worthy of there talents. Unlike today the only time you get to see worthy actors together for a film. It seems to be for a comic book movie or a bad run of the mill cliche ridden story. I think maybe it’s the actors ego’s of today that is less about collaboration and being shown up on screen. But my thinking is if you have co-stars it keeps you on top of your game, Though it may also be the Fact that actor’s salaries are so high today and most budgets must stay mid-size. The irony is that classic actors who have become legendary were more then willing to collaborate where as the disposable actors of today are all about themselves and there non-existent legacy.

Today the film would actually have to cast arab actors instead of classically trained brits for most of the roles. The brits do no disservice to there characters. The only one who comes close to being the same ethnicity of his character is Omar Shariff.

This film truly is the definition of word epic. Watching this film is like reading a great novel. It fills in all the details and motives for the story. Where as other directors would have condensed or explained certain story aspects in dialogue. Instead of showing them. It presents a character who is both idealistic and brave. But get overcome with his own reputation. He is capable of mercy, fear and over the top revenge.

I warn you if your going to watch this clear your calendar as it is almost 4 hours long. David Lean’s camerawork is amazing he makes everything beautiful and most of the movie takes place in the desert. There is nothing more beautiful then the sight of peter o’toole the Brad Pitt of his day. (With infinitely more talent) The sight of his piercing blue eyes n the dry landscape across the desert. You can see what made women’s heart A flutter. Yes, I am a straight male.

I’m sure with all these classic actors who were all notorious drinkers casting this film a quarter of the budget was spent on booze. The battle scenes while not as action filled as we are so used today are amazingly shot and choreographed. A true sight to behold.

  • Currently 4.0/5 Stars.
Picture of J. Ridiculous

J. Ridicul​ous

8Jun09

It may be the definitive epic film, with its long run time, sweeping visual scope and huge canvas of battles and varying peoples. What makes it so unusual is that all of that epic trapping is put in service of a story that illuminates one complex and incredibly conflicted man. Throughout, TE Lawrence struggles with his sense of identity, loyalty and his attitude toward the violence he encounters while serving in Arabia during the WWI. It might be one of the most visually influential films ever made.

  • Currently 5.0/5 Stars.
Picture of asuraf

asuraf

20Apr09

David Lean won the second of his two Best Director Oscars for this sweeping desert classic – part war film, part bio-pic, part poli-social commentary – about the adventures of T.E. Lawrence and his campaign during WWI to unite the Arabs against the Turks, with grudging British assistance. Peter O’Toole gives one of the great performances in film history as Lawrence, a blue eyed, soft-spoken romantic who finds a kind of elegance in the desert (“it’s clean”), and profits a swelled vanity when the Arabs take him in as their own in a difficult, seemingly impossible push against the Turkish army; when his carefully constructed war against the Turks – destroying their rail system, thus weakening their supply of arms – leads to a systematic massacre, Lawrence straddles the thin line between war hero and ego maniacal messiah. At nearly four hours, this is one of the few long movies that never feels its length; it begins with a script (by Robert Bolt and Michael Wilson, originally uncredited due to the blacklist), which is constantly at odds with the film’s romantic vision of the desert in portraying Lawrence and his duel role as savior/egotist, and through Lean (and by extension, Freddie Young’s mesmerizing wide-screen photography), grants the story enough wealth, beauty, scope, and care to never have to rely on bio-pic cliches to make Lawrence a fully realized, conflicted anti-hero.

  • Currently 5.0/5 Stars.
Picture of Karl Wiederaenders

Karl Wiedera​enders

21Jan09

This Epic film sets one of the most brilliant larger than life personalities in a war that shook the world and changed the shape of politics and borders all throughout the rest of the twentieth century this war would have repercussions that last even unto today. Within this war is also a revolution the affects of which we are truly realizing with all this world shaking and grand film making I still find myself lost into this world still bigger than the characters or events that move them. This ocean desert that they all find themselves swept up in becomes a beautiful and cruel world filled with danger characters easily become lost among this desert that easily dwarfs everything else in the film. The desert controls them and shifts all things within it almost imperceptibly. Everything in this movie may be epic but nothing can over power the sands of the desert.

  • Currently 5.0/5 Stars.
Picture of jaredmobarak

jaredmo​barak

26Nov08

Lawrence of Arabia is oftentimes listed as one of the greatest films of all time. Not only that, but many say Peter O’Toole’s performance as T.E. Lawrence is the greatest piece of acting ever to be captured onscreen as well. Being that the movie was made 45 years ago, I wasn’t going into it thinking I would agree with either statement necessarily. Whether the four hour run time was too daunting to get my hopes up or not, I knew that no matter what, I needed to finally see this film. Being that it would show on the big theatre screen of the Market Arcade, I couldn’t make up an excuse. These were prime viewing circumstances and I was going to go for the ride from Cairo to the Middle East along with the band of Arab tribes trying to take back their land from the Turks.

On a technical level, Lawrence of Arabia has few equals. Director David Lean has created something with true epic focus. There are no advanced computer graphics multiplying fake people into huge battle scenes, this had to be done with real extras, sweltering in the desert heat waiting for their opportunity to fight amongst the movie’s stars. The scope is wide and Lean is never afraid to show the desert as a desolate wasteland because the shots are beautiful to behold. The British didn’t understand what Lawrence saw in the sand, but viewing the landscape shots here, the audience can see the tranquility and beauty that it truly holds. This was a big-budget movie and it shows by the settings besides the desert. When we arrive in Cairo and see the excess with which the soldiers live; its affluence is on display. Not only by the material objects, but also by the soldiers’ utter ambivalence to the fight while their Arab counterparts are trekking through the sun-ravaged desert to claim victory.

It is this juxtaposition between the British forces and Arab fighters that backbone the film. Yes, T.E. Lawrence is the focal point and his journey from army outcast to Arab liberator is the story arc we follow, but it is the fact that he tries to live in both worlds which really defines the course of actions on display. Credit does have to go to Peter O’Toole for his ability to grow his character throughout and display the emotion and conflict living inside him. Lawrence saw an opportunity to help the Arab tribes regain control of their land despite Britain’s refusal to give them artillery. Even at this early moment, he might have suspected this lack of true support as a sign of future motives, but he was so focused on his cause and the fact that he could do anything he set his mind to, he just didn’t care. When he finally succeeds with his first mission, he returns a broken man, having killed and seen things he never wanted to see. He knew it was all for the best, though, and needed to stick by his word of setting his new friends into a free land. Only when the men at Cairo, who once laughed at his expense, praise him with accolades and promotions does Lawrence first start becoming a man without a clear purpose. A man that was accepted by no one now finds himself loved by two distinct cultures, and must somehow cope with the success or eventually fall as a result.

Besides the excellent performance by O’Toole—intense, sarcastically humorous, and heartbreakingly real throughout—we are also treated to an acting clinic from the supporting players. Omar Sharif is fantastic as the Arab Sherif Ali who agrees to accompany Lawrence on his suicide mission to take a Turkish outpost. Sharif gives Ali a realistic progression from a man who cannot see a white man surviving anything in their future, to one who would follow Lawrence into Hell if asked. Anthony Quinn is also great as Auda abu Tayi, a leader of a tribe that can be bought by whoever offers most. His interactions with O’Toole are some of the best moments in the film because Lawrence always knows what to say to persuade Auda into doing something for his own interests and not for monetary gain, (although he still likes to take something as a souvenir for his troubles). Even Alec Guinness brings an effective performance despite playing an Arab Prince. There are many moments where the allusions to his later Obi-Wan Kenobi character come through making me smile, but the accent is hidden nicely into a British educated Arab speech that helps me forget he is as much an Englishmen as O’Toole is Irish.

In the end, however, it is the story which truly leaves a mark. During the runtime, I was slowly seeing some redundancies and wondering if an hour could have easily been chopped off without a second glance. Disappointment was setting in and I was thinking I might have to give it a 7 or 8 rating as a whole. Once the final scenes play out though, you realize why we needed everything that came before. It is Lawrence’s success in battle that both leave him broken but also ripe for persuasion into continuing on. The British were looking for a way to have Arabs do the work but eventually swoop in and take the Middle East for themselves, and with Lawrence, they had their man to rally the troops. Lawrence was neither British nor Arab, but instead a man beyond his dreams and ideals. The Arab tribes would never be able to live in harmony for a peaceful unity, and the British were just waiting for the implosion to occur. When all is said and done, Lawrence realizes he is not the God that people, and himself, saw him as, but a pawn that has been played from the beginning. His sanity and drive for good is sucked out of him because while it seemed he was accepted by both worlds, he really didn’t belong to either.

  • Currently 4.0/5 Stars.