Watch unlimited films online for $6.99.
Try MUBI for FREE.
 

Synopsis

Brandon and Philip are two young men who share a New York apartment. They consider themselves intellectually superior to their friend David Kentley and as a consequence decide to murder him. Together they strangle David with a rope and placing the body in an old chest, they proceed to hold a small party. The guests include David’s father, his fiancée Janet and their old schoolteacher Rupert from whom they mistakenly took their ideas. As Brandon becomes increasingly more daring, Rupert begins to suspect. —IMDb

Director

Original

Alfred Hitchcock

Alfred Hitchcock has been the most well-known director to the general public since the 1940s – and he remains so in the 21st century, more than 25 years after his death. His name evokes instant expectations on the part of audiences around the world: of a memorable night of movie-watching highlighted by at least two or three great chills (and a few more good ones), some striking black comedy, and an eccentric characterization or two in virtually every one of the director’s movies across a half-century – and usually laced with a comical cameo appearance by the director himself.

Alfred Joseph Hitchcock was born into a devoutly Catholic family in London, and his religious upbringing – with its attendant issues of guilt – would have a powerful influence on the psychological underpinnings of his later work. He was trained at a technical school, and initially gravitated to movies through art courses and advertising. He studied the work of other filmmakers, most notably the German expressionists… read more

Wall

Displaying 4 of 43 wall posts.
Picture of Vic

Vic

25May12

The story wasn't as interesting or complex as much of Hitchcock's other movies, but I still really dug the long camera shots and the real-time narrative.

Picture of Rupert Pupkin
Picture of Gary Phillips

Gary Phillips

26Mar12

Ropey. ( Brit informal: inferior or inadequate; below par)

Chris Jones

26Feb12

What’s interesting is that the problems that this movie has-the datedness, the corny dialogue, the occasional Shatner-esque levels of scenery chewing-don’t disappear over its course, they just cease to matter by the time you reach the climax. Legitimately one of the most well structured films I’ve ever seen. Also, you can practically sink your teeth into the homoerotic tension between Brandon and Phillip.

Jyoti likes this

Related Films

Fans

Displaying 5 of 1924 fans.

Articles

Our roundup of essays and articles on this film.
W184

Daily Briefing. Hitchcock, Borzage, Ozu, More

By David Hudson on April 24, 2012

Also: The book on Philip Kaufman, the Whitney Biennial, Godard and Brakhage @ MoMA and more.

read article

Lists

Displaying 5 of 318 lists.

Reviews

Displaying 4 of 6

ROPE [1948]

By Jesse Taylor on August 18, 2011

“Rope” may not be the greatest Hitchcock film, but it certainly is one of the most entertaining. It has been criticized in the past for coming off too much like a stage play [which is what the film…  read review

Hitchcock's masterpice.

By barbude​an on May 31, 2011

Que Alfred Hitchcock é o mestre do suspense todo cinéfilo já sabe, afinal, são dele as conhecidas obras-primas Psicose (1960), Janela Indiscreta (1954) e Um Corpo que Cai (1958), filmes que o consagraram…  read review

Classic Hitchcock, best James Stewart Team-up

By Conner Rainwat​er on May 30, 2010

My favorite Hitchcock and James Stewart pairing, it’s just an amazingly dark film about the art of killing. It’s a deep seeded dream that most people can relate to in some way, would you kill someone…  read review

Untitled

By timotay​o on September 6, 2009

An amazing film. Why?

Five words: eighty-minute film in ten shots.

Before RUSSIAN ARK, there was…..ROPE!

Based off a stage play by Patrick Hamilton, the story is nonetheless based…  read review

Forum

Displaying 1 discussion topic.

does rope consist of only 4 cuts?

7 posts by 5 people 10 months ago