Watch unlimited films online for $6.99.
Try MUBI for FREE.
 

Russian Ark

Russkiy kovcheg

Russia, Germany

2002

99 Min
Color
1.85:1
Russian
  • Currently 3.8/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

   |   

DIR Aleksandr Sokurov

PROD Andrey Deryabin, Jens Meurer, Karsten Stöter

SCR Aleksandr Sokurov, Boris Khaimsky, Anatoli Nikiforov, Svetlana Proskurina

DP Tilman Büttner

CAST Sergei Dontsov, Mariya Kuznetsova, Leonid Mozgovoy, Mikhail Piotrovsky, David Giorgobiani

ED Stefan Ciupek, Sergei Ivanov, Betna Kuntzsch

MUSIC Sergei Yevtushenko

Toronto (Visions): Visions Award, Cannes (In Competition), Telluride, New York, Rotterdam (Main Programme), Karlovy Vary (Horizons)

Synopsis

A contemporary Russian filmmaker unexpectedly stumbles into the past and finds himself in the Hermitage in St Petersburg, surrounded by early 17th century society. Accompanied by a French diplomat he then passes through various epochs and, before stormy events and twists of fate release him back to the present, he marvels with the foreigner at the bizarre and incredible deeds of those who once held the Russian empire in their grasp. In long, sweeping shots, almost without any editing, czarinas and czars file past the camera, including the last emperor, while the two men conduct a passionate discussion on what they witness in these grand palatial halls. The Frenchman’s commentary represents traditional Western European contempt and also admiration for this mysterious and somewhat exotic country; the filmmaker’s words express the division within Russians who reject and also acknowledge European culture. Sokurov declares: “I do not perceive my film as a return to history; Russia’s relationship with Europe is just as much a key issue now as it was at anytime in the past”. –Karoly Vary International Film Festival

Director

Original

Aleksandr Sokurov

Alexander Nikolayevich Sokurov (Russian: Алекса́ндр Никола́евич Соку́ров) (b. June 14, 1951, Podorwikha, Irkutsk Oblast) is a Russian filmmaker from St Petersburg who has been hailed as successor to renowned director Andrei Tarkovsky.

Sokurov was born in Siberia in the officer’s family on June 14, 1951. He graduated from the History Department of the Nizhny Novgorod University in 1974 and entered one of the VGIK studios the following year. There he made friends with Tarkovsky and was deeply influenced by his Mirror.

Most of Sokurov’s early features were banned by Soviet authorities. During his early period, he produced numerous documentaries, including an interview with Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and a reportage about Grigori Kozintsev’s flat in St Petersburg.

Mother and Son (1996) was his first internationally acclaimed feature film. It was mirrored by Father and Son (2003) which baffled the critics with its implicit homoeroticism (though Sokurov himself has criticized… read more

Wall

Displaying 4 of 73 wall posts.

Brent Schaus

27May12

A film I think all film-lovers should watch. Museum-lovers, too. And those fascinated by Russian history. Deep feelers should take a look, along with costume-lovers. Don't bother if beauty bores you.

Picture of Karthik

Karthik

24May12

Part of me succumbed to a contemplative mood the film induces, a brooding over transience, cultural power, the performance of Russia BUT part of me rebelled, feeling the whole thing was unselfconsciously middebrow, pandering to, while supposedly ironizing, a taste for sumptuousness w/ a memento mori as garnish: a Baroque painting with a skull & 'all that flesh'. That was my immediate reaction; Ill have to reevaluate

Picture of DT

DT

23May12

The cinematography is undoubtedly impressive, the production itself also opulent in both its detail and scale. But the film is much more than that: a work of history, art, nationalism, meta-fiction and experimentation; a living, breathing narrative from the first frame to the last, on top of being an aural and visual banquet. The many levels upon which this film works makes it an entrancing journey.

HKFanatic likes this

Picture of lola

lola

21May12

I thought is was "just a documental" but it is much more than that yet not a movie. The one take idea is just great. I love it. Very ingenious too because it kept me engaged since the begining not being quite sure on the development of the "story". "Walking" all through the Hermitage listening the voices of the history and the people is great. Loved Rembrand's Return of the prodigal son. Touching!

Related Films

Fans

Displaying 5 of 1401 fans.

Lists

Displaying 5 of 274 lists.

Reviews

Displaying 4 of 4

Russian Ark

By Príncip​e Myshkin on March 14, 2011

What an exquisite movie. It won me over gradually. After the first twenty minutes I was thinking: «This may be a technical stunt, but hardly more than that». As the film progressed, I realized how…  read review

Formally stunning meditation on Russian culture and history

By Braden Vallenè​res on July 5, 2010

Absolutely amazing. Absolutely awe-inspiring. Absolutely brilliant.

Where to begin? Perhaps I’ll get this out of the way: the 96 minute film was shot in one continuous take. One continuous…  read review

Lavishing!

By Beneezy on March 21, 2010

(Sunday / March 21, 2010 / 1:30am)

What beauty! A tour de force! Lavishing! I was in a whole other level filled with delightful people and ravishing paintings. I traveled on my chair while watching…  read review

Untitled

By Kenji on March 5, 2009

Russian Ark is not only a film of incomparable technical ambition; a sinuous, languorous, labyrinthine ramble, achieved in a single, astounding 96 minute digital take, that glides stealthily through…  read review

Forum

Displaying 1 discussion topic.