Watch unlimited films online for $6.99.
Try MUBI for FREE.
 

Wall

Displaying wall posts 1 - 30 of 102 in total
Picture of Matt Richards

Matt Richards

22May12

I can only say that I was pleasantly surprised by the excellent performances and very solid film making. Ritchie keeps the usual Hollywood ridiculousness in check and Toadface from Mad Men does an excellent job. Downy is superb and it doesn't feel like it's sole purpose is to sell video games. The only thing missing was a greater depth or moral? what did it teach me? nothing..this is entertainment only. 3.5 stars

Picture of longstreth

longstreth

7May12

Doesn't hold up, even after a second viewing. I like RDJ and Jude Law, but the plot is silly, Irene Adler's part is woefully miscast, and Ritchie's post-modern trickery really doesn't mesh with the Sherlock Holmes mythos. Points for trying, nonetheless.

Picture of Maegatron

Maegatron

29Mar12

Great acting. Bad everything else.

John Doe likes this

Picture of 4LOM

4LOM

25Mar12

Ich kombiniere: Ein ganz mieser Streifen.

Picture of malagueira

malagueira

5Feb12

Couldn't be worse.

Picture of faelmf

faelmf

15Jan12

as a entertainment, it works well. but, sometimes, the script underestimate the spectator's intelligence

Picture of Nathan.

Nathan.

1Jan12

What an absolute piece of shit.

Graeme Higginson and 2 others like this

divya, malagueira

Picture of Christopher A. Cook

Christopher A. Cook

23Dec11

I want to like this movie but I can't. For one never at one time was I intrigued by the central mystery, which I think is a very bad omen for a Holmes movie. A friend pointed out that Ritchie can only do one male relationship, jabs back and forth with a bit o' love. Look at Turkish and Tommy in Snatch, now back to Holmes and Watson. I like both of the leads and they do their part well, but this feels like a misfire.

Picture of mfg

mfg

6Dec11

As a fan of the actual novels, I'm glad there's finally an adaptation true to Arthur Conan Doyle's story.

Picture of A Serious Man Who Wasn't There

A Serious Man Who Wasn't There

23Jun11

This movie should be called ROBERT DOWNEY JR. TRYING TO SAVE GUY RITCHIE EVEN IF SHERLOCK HOLMES LOOKS MORE LIKE A PROFESSIONAL FIGHTER THAN A BRILLIANT DETECTIVE (even if the detective skills are primordial, and not forgotten, but just here's another prove that Holmes could be the next guy in DIE HARD WITH BRAINS, and here's a slow motion detailed and entertaining about how to crush someone, and he's good the end).

Picture of SeanMichael

SeanMichael

5Jun11

Witty banter and quite entertaining but mostly just witty banter.

PaperSoap likes this

Picture of Daniel S.

Daniel S.

8May11

The film plays with the supposed lack of culture of the audience. Here, Holmes and Watson have roughly the same age, prefer action to deduction and if Sherlock thinks, it's rather in order to anticipate than to make a deduction. Superb production design, though. Already forgotten.

Picture of Erik Gregersen

Erik Gregersen

7May11

Some goofy bits, but on the whole quite entertaining. Also loved the ridiculously obscure reference to Donati's Comet.

Picture of Kid Sisyphus

Kid Sisyphus

24Apr11

I hope Robert Downey Jr. takes Guy Ritchie with him the next time he goes to prison.

Alex M. likes this

Picture of Christopher Smith

Christopher Smith

4Apr11

There are things that work about it - Downey Jr. and Law have some nice chemistry, and the intricate production design is impressive. But Ritchie's attempts to modernize the material - an emphasis on action, flashy visuals, and the ridiculous kung-fu Holmes - are hit or miss. Reasonably entertaining (certainly one of Ritchie's better), but not any more substantial than a slightly above-average Hollywood blockbuster.

Picture of Zmaja

Zmaja

25Mar11

ugodno iznenadenje

WhatsUpWill

23Mar11

Incredibly entertaining. I was surprised.

Picture of Nikola

Nikola

8Mar11

One of the most overrated movies in recent history.

Picture of Tony Smith

Tony Smith

15Feb11

This movie is frustrating and poorly made.

Xurxo G Penalta

4Feb11

fast moving re-imagining ... even faster forgetting on my part ...

Picture of tripl3

tripl3

10Jan11

I rated it with four stars. While it's not mind-blowing, and it does have some serious plot goofs, it does what it's supposed to be doing - and excels in it. Great acting, great scenery, great sound and at large entertaining action/detective flick for well spent time on Sunday evening (or early Monday morning, in my case). And you still can have fun guessing how the plot will unravel.

Bambang N Karim

10Jan11

Ritchie owes to the well-written scripts which is fit to the style ( a F*** You attitude character film of his previous (good) works. The cinematography makes the movie become such an engrossing and beautiful piece. With the success and the return to the stakeholders, they should push more by adding bromance between Holmes – Watson in the next sequel. After all, this is Guy Ritchie film.

Picture of masstrovato

masstrovato

9Jan11

Non un capolavoro. Gradevole ma trascurabile.

Picture of Uli³Cain

Uli³Cain

5Dec10

It's fine for what it is, and the performances were fine, but I think this film is exactly what is wrong with studio pictures.

Picture of Calhoun Kersten

Calhoun Kersten

29Sep10

Pure unadulterated fun that doesn't pretend to be much else. It's certainly not the best depiction of Sherlock Holmes, but the fight scenes were well choreographed and Downey Jr. was enjoyable in the role. Those who aren't fans of Ritchie's highly stylized form may not be too happy with this, while die-hard Ritchie fans may feel let down by his cleaned up, studio efforts. Either way, it's fun for what it is.

Picture of Noslen

Noslen

7Sep10

Uma versão moderna da personagem mais racional do universo de Arthur Conan Doyle's. O filme é um autêntico blockbuster repleto de momentos hilariantes e uma narrativa muito bem composta, que nos leva a um desenlace surpreendente.

Picture of FailedImitator

FailedImitator

2Sep10

I thought this was good, that is, until I saw the contemporary re-imagining TV show on BBC.

Picture of pjjrfan

pjjrfan

25Aug10

I liked it just with the banter between Jude Law and Downey, they seemed to have a strong chemistry that lifted the movie in my view. I didn't really get into the special effects but it was a delighful display of two men who know each other very well and play off each other pushing each others buttons. that part of the movie was a delight for me.