ULA ZUHRA
25Dec11
exactly what I thought, although a good part among other good parts!
Nunca tímido de admitir que admira (y plagia a HItchcock) en gran parte de su filmografía, sobre todo en sus primeras películas, no hay ninguna duda de que ésta es una de sus más "hitchcockianas", en especial por la técnica. Aunque el tema de las personalidades múltiples también es un obvio guiño al director británico. Todavía no estoy seguro de que pasa durante los últimos 15 min. pero aún así creo que es genial.
This is a mess of film, but somehow I can't stop myself from enjoying it.
I'll give Brian DePalma credit for the split screen usage and making the movie worth it by the time the credits roll. But Sisters is a shameless Alfred Hitchcock ripoff, plain and simple.
i'm really glad that the still mubi uses to represent this film is from one of the split screen scenes.
Split-screen shots are brilliant! Bernard Herrmann's score can get annoying and over-the-top compared to his other scores. Acting is typical B-Movie 70s. Margot Kidder's forced French accent was bad but not annoying because she's beautiful and we get to see her tits. Worth watching with friends during drunken Halloween parties!
The last scene (the ending) is one of the best and most humorous ending I've seen this year. And I have to agree that the split screen is nicely executed.
emulating Hitchcock except Hitchcock never showed excessive gore =P. & let's be honest here DePalma is no Hitchcock by any stretch of the imagination.
Pretty ridiculous premise, but the split screen is really innovative and well used. Margot Kidder gives a decent performance, even the French Canadian accent!
Agreed, Seth. The split screen actually worked rather than diminish what was happening in the scene. In 500 days of Summer, there is a beautiful split as well.
Just saw this... not bad at all. Very subtle humor in blocking and his TV world cutaways. Key referencing made by Mr. W Anderson here.
Sisters is tightly structured, visceral, and suspenseful. It gets off to a slow start, but after the scene that I will only call “the incident”, the pacing speeds up considerably. Unfortunately, Sisters doesn’t slow down enough to resolve its subplots, which are left behind as it races through the last act. This movie is very similar to Images, which was released the previous year.
my favorite part is when the woman at the asylum says "I GOT SICK BECAUSE SOMEONE CALLED ME ON THE TELEPHONE!!!"
From the 70’s on, I followed Brian De Palma’s career with excitement. He didn’t have the (financial) success of his contemporaries Martin Scorsese or Francis Ford Coppola but developed his own themes throughout his entire filmography. I consider him as a very bright and gifted director and watch one or two of his movies each year, always with the same pleasure. Shot a few years before OBSESSION and BLOW OUT, SISTERS is the first De Palma movie that willfully calls Alfred Hitchcock’s paternal figure as reference. Bernard Herrmann’s musical score, a screenplay that puts together PSYCHO, REAR WINDOW and SPELLBOUND and the terrific ability to create tension in the audience’s mind are some of the elements reminding us of the British master. The use of the split-screen technique, more than suggestive sex scenes and the desire to handle the audience as a voyeur (cf. SISTERS’s first scene) are nevertheless hints of De Palma’s wish to be also considered as an auteur. Highly recommended.
The thing that garbage disposal's are made of... another shit stained Brian De Palma film. Forgive me. I wont even mention Kidder's accent....
It's a little entertaining movie, not De Palma's best though. But there are certain scenes that are really great.