After finishing what would become his international phenomenon Rashomon, Akira Kurosawa immediately turned to one of the most daring, and problem-plagued, productions of his career. The Idiot, an adaptation of Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s nineteenth-century masterpiece about a wayward, pure soul’s reintegration into society— updated by Kurosawa to capture Japan’s postwar aimlessness—was a victim of studio interference and, finally, public indifference. Today, this “folly” looks ever more fascinating, a stylish, otherworldly evocation of one man’s wintry mindscape. —The Criterion Collection
The son of an army officer, Kurosawa studied art before gravitating to film as a means of supporting himself. He served seven years as an assistant to director Kajiro Yamamoto before he began his own directorial career with Sanshiro Sugata (1943), a film about the 19th century struggle for supremacy between adherents of judo and jujitsu that so impressed the military government, he was prevailed upon to make a sequel (Sanshiro Sugata Part Two). Following the end of World War II, Kurosawa’s career gathered speed with a series of films that cut across all genres, from crime thrillers to period dramas. Among the latter, his Rashomon (1951) became the first postwar Japanese film to find wide favor with Western audiences. It was Kurosawa’s The Seven Samurai (1954), however, that made the largest impact of any of his movies outside of Japan. Although heavily cut for its original release, this three-hour-plus medieval action drama, shot with painstaking… read more
"Wisdom comes in two kinds: important and unimportant. But nobody realizes that." This film demonstrates the latter. Save a few scenes and a couple good camera movements, the pacing is too slow, the tension soap-operatic and the editing is flat out clumsy. Overall, a story that is not for the cinema. P.S. Three years later parts of the score (the good ones) were stolen by Disney for 20,000 LEAGUES UNDER THE SEA.
Incredible sequences, but jarring transitions thanks to the studio chopping the fluidity out of the film. Still, we can imagine what a masterpiece this could have been. Use your imagination to fill in the blanks, it is fantastic even so.
What we see are only glimpses of what Kurosawa had intended in the first place, that's why the individual scenes are so good and the final product amounts to nothing but an absolute mess. For some reason I keep thinking that the many scenes involving knives are just Kurosawa telling us something else was butchered in the process...
Let's start this one with a few things going on here at The Auteurs. Hong Sang-soo's Night and Day is currently playing at Facets in Chicago
The concept behind the box is simplicity itself, exemplified by its title: "25 Films By Akira Kurosawa." This is released in commemoration