Watch unlimited films online for $6.99.
Try MUBI for FREE.
 

Synopsis

King Henry II keeps his wife, Eleanor locked away in the towers because of her frequent attempts to overthrow him. With Eleanor out of the way he can have his dalliances with his young mistress. Needless to say the queen is not pleased, although she still has affection for the king. Working through her sons, she plots the king’s demise and the rise of her second and preferred son, Richard, to the throne. The youngest son, John, an overweight buffoon and the only son holding his father’s affection is the king’s choice after the death of his first son, young Henry. But John is also overly eager for power and is willing to plot his father’s demise with middle brother, Geoffrey and the young king of France, Phillip. Geoffrey, of course sees his younger brother’s weakness and sees that route as his path to power. Obviously political and court intrigue ensues. —IMDb

Director

Original

Andrei Konchalovsky

The Russian theatre and film director Andrei Konchalovsky is an elder brother of Nikita Mikhalkov, born August, 20, 1937. As a youngster he planned to pursue a career of a musician and learned to play piano but his love for cinema outweighed and he entered VGIK-the major state film school where he studied under Mikhail Romm. At VGIK he met Tarkovsky, they collaborated on Ivan’s childhood and Andrei Rublev. For his length feature debut The First Teacher (1961), he chose the book by Chingis Aitmatov about the post-1917 Revolution period in the southern Russia. His next film, a black and white Asya Klyachina’s Story although made in 1966 was not released until a decade later because it failed to comply with the strict requirements of the Russian censorship of the period. A Nest of Gentry (1969) – a study of the 19 c. aristocracy – was praised for its visual beauty but attacked by critics as mannered. Konchalovsky’s powerful Uncle Vanya (1970) from the play by Chekhov is regarded by many… read more

Wall

Displaying 2 wall posts.
Picture of ramosbarajas

ramosbarajas

17Feb12

Overly long, there is not much to make this better than the 1968 version. The performances do not compare to the other film. The play itself is fantastic, but here the adaptation or approach fails.

Picture of Roscoe

Roscoe

29Jan12

Sad -- it nowhere approaches the quality of the original film. The cheesy sets and amateurish supporting cast aren't mitigated by the appalling lack of chemistry between Close and Stewart.

Related Films

Fans

Displaying 1 of 1 fans.

Lists

Displaying 2 of 2 lists.

Reviews

No reviews yet — Write the first

Forum

Displaying 0 discussion topics.