Bane/Smith and Neo are both in an unconscious state. The former is said to be merely asleep, whereas neural patterns of Neo are identical to those of people who are connected to the Matrix. Morpheus, dispirited after the destruction of the Nebuchadnezzar and discovering the true nature of the Prophecy at the end of the last film, starts a search for Neo within the Matrix despite him not being jacked in. Neo is in fact trapped in a limbo: a subway station named “Mobil Avenue” that is a transition zone between the Matrix and the Source (the Machine mainframe). “Mobil” is notably an anagram for “Limbo”.
The younger half of the writing-directing-producing team The Wachowski Brothers, Andy Wachowski dropped out of Emerson College in Boston to pursue a career in show business. Collaborating with his older brother Larry, the duo completed their first script which was optioned by producer Dino De Laurentiis and eventually became the Warner Bros. feature “Assassins” (1995). Another writer polished the script, so the finished product, starring Sylvester Stallone and Antonio Banderas as hit men, veered between generic actioner and character study and ended up a box-office disappointment.
The Wachowskis chose a chancy project for their directorial debut, “Bound” (1996), a romance-thriller featuring Jennifer Tilly and Gina Gershon as criminal lesbians in love. Drawing on influences as varied as Billy Wilder (“Double Indemnity” 1944), Roman Polanski (“Chinatown” 1974) and Sam Raimi (“The Evil Dead” 1983), the brothers set out to create a modern film noir that would invert the genre. With… read more
One half of the fraternal filmmaking duo known as the Wachowski Brothers, Larry Wachowski and sibling Andy were the creative minds behind the “Matrix” trilogy (2000, 2003), one of the most imaginative and influential film series in Hollywood history. Conceived from a childhood steeped in fantasy novels and comic books, the “Matrix” films combined martial arts action with literary and cinematic references and a wide array of world religious and philosophical tenets. The result was a massively popular trio of films that largely redefined the action genre and CGI effects as a whole for a new generation of moviegoers. While the brothers continued to release big-screen epics in its wake, including “V for Vendetta” (2005) and “Ninja Assassin” (2009), Larry Wachowski earned as much press for his personal life, which included a relationship with a dominatrix and rumored gender reassignment, coupled with a new name, Lana Wachowski. Despite the gossip, he and brother Andy remained two of the… read more
Para finalizar, o mais fraquinho da trilogia, com diálogos que rompem a barreira do ridículo e histórias paralelas ainda mais ridículas e irrelevantes. Neo quase pôs tudo a perder por um motivo BEM egoísta. Porém, no final, ele se entrega. Percebe que PRECISA abrir mão de sua individualidade para que todos possam sobreviver. E assim, o fim ("o retorno à fonte") fecha o ciclo iniciado com a "saída" da mesma fonte.
The idea of The Matrix is amazing, but Reloaded and Revolutions falls short....really short. They were grasping for straws at the end. It was at times confusing, but most of the time just poor acting. In short watch The Matrix and Animatrix and stop it's not worth it to keep going. I wish I did.
Excuse me, but "quite possibly the worst film ever made" is an objective statement. Simply saying "I think this movie sucks" would have been a subjective opinion. The Hitler comment doesn't make much sense, either; Goebbels would have been the obvious choice. I like how you wrote my name in all caps, though.
It is still a subjective statement. You clearly realize that you cannot objectively quantify the quality of a film, yet you are trying to make an exception in this instance solely because his opinion of the film happens to fall on the furthest end of his spectrum of taste. Which is totally inconsequential, because - as we have already covered - the quality of a film cannot be stated objectively. Thus making any statement about its quality an opinion, thus making the statement subjective. As for the film itself, perhaps he is being a tad hyperbolic in calling it one of the worst films ever made, but not by much. In fact, relative to its budget, I would argue that he is correct. This thing is an abomination.
"You clearly realize that you cannot objectively quantify the quality of a film, yet you are trying to make an exception in this instance" This is an assumption. It happens to not be true, so it makes your argument not so good. I actually do think films can be assessed objectively. Granted, only to a certain point, sure, but nonetheless. By the way, I like the movie, but that's a bit besides the point. It's still nowhere near the worst film ever made--it's at least competent on every level. Just what is so bad about it that it deserves to be called the "worst film ever made" and "an abomination"?
Well then, excuse the assumption, but if that is not the case, then you are simply incorrect. Films cannot be assessed as either objectively good or bad. Agreements and general consensuses may certainly exist, but to say that a film can be objectively quantified as good or bad on any level is simply to misunderstand what objectivity is. As for why I think that this is one of the worst films of all time? First of all, as I've already said, I only hold that opinion relative to its budget. That said, here are some of the qualities I would deem bad about it: An extreme excess of insufferably self-important, pseudo-philosophical dialogue; hackneyed action sequences; absurd inconsistencies and ridiculous plot holes; uneven pacing; and an utterly unsatisfying ending.