Watch unlimited films online for $6.99.
Try MUBI for FREE.
 

Synopsis

The beginning of the 17th century. America is a seemingly primeval wilderness, populated by a complex weave of native tribes. Although all these native peoples live in harmony with nature, their coexistence as different tribes is an uneasy equilibrium. Inevitably, any intruder from outside this world is bound to upset the balance of these relationships.
In April 1607 three ships appear, carrying 103 passengers. Their own island home, England, is some 5,000 kilometres east. They have been commissioned by their sponsor, the Royal Virginia Company, to found a new home in a place they call “the New World”. This new home is to be a bridgehead for their culture, their religion and their economic system.
The flagship of the fleet is the Susan Constant. Below deck, the rebellious John Smith has been put in irons. He is to be hanged for refusing to obey orders. But Captain Christopher Newport soon gives Smith his freedom again. He knows that he will need every able-bodied man – especially someone of Smith’s abilities – if he is to survive in this wilderness. Neither New­port nor the settlers are aware that they have landed in a highly developed kingdom, ruled by the powerful chief, Powhatan.

The strangers soon discover that they cannot cope alone in their new, rugged environment. Smith decides to ask the tribes for their help, and en­coun­ters an ethereal young woman who seems more elfin than human. The name of this wilful, temperamental girl is Pocahontas – “the Playful One”. She is Powhatan’s favourite daughter. Smith and Pocahontas soon find them­selves drawn to each other. Their feelings go far beyond friendship, or even romance, and are the basis of one of the most enduring Ameri­can legends of the last 400 years. –Berlinale

Director

Original

Terrence Malick

Terrence Malick is one of the great enigmas of contemporary filmmaking, a shadowy figure whose towering reputation rests almost entirely on a pair of near-perfect features released a generation ago. A visual stylist beyond compare, Malick emerged during the golden era of 1970s American movie-making, bringing to the screen a dreamlike, ethereal beauty countered by elliptical, ironic storytelling; resonant and mythic, his films illuminated themes of love and death with rare mastery, their indelible images distinguished by economy and precision. Born in Waco, TX, on November 30, 1943, Malick spent many of his formative summers working as a farmhand, an experience upon which he would draw extensively in his films. Upon graduating from Harvard with a degree in philosophy, he entered Magdalen College in Oxford as a Rhodes scholar, but exited prior to completing his final thesis. On returning to the U.S., he became a freelance journalist, with his byline appearing in such publications as Life… read more

Wall

Displaying 4 of 70 wall posts.
Picture of Myles O'Mara

Myles O'Mara

27May12

Terribly depressing. The entire cast slowly became more and more depraved throughout the film, but perhaps such were the colonial days... not too far off from medieval times.

Picture of Markus Baumknecht

Markus Baumknecht

9Apr12

Old Native American proverb: "Only when every cliché about Native Americans has been ruminated about a billion times you will realise that you can't go back to a past that never existed." Is there anything about this film that is not the narrative equivalent of Colin Farrell's acting?

Ultra Kebab likes this

  • Picture of elmer_fishsticks

    elmer_fishsticks

    12Apr12

    Elmer Fishsticks proverb: "People who think that The New World revels in the Native American world it depicts are probably not very intelligent."

  • Picture of Markus Baumknecht

    Markus Baumknecht

    12Apr12

    what else is it doing, then? I'm open to changing my mind here.

  • Picture of uglyfact:filmsaremadeoutoffilms

    uglyfact:filmsaremadeoutoffilms

    12Apr12

    i don't think it does. I think that's the point. John smith is just a dreamer. He wishes the native american world was that way...

  • Picture of Markus Baumknecht

    Markus Baumknecht

    19May12

    I can imagine you are right and Malick didn't intend it to be like that, but still there is an element that really annoys me about this movie. Terence Malick's style is the same for all his more recent movies: The Thin Red Line, The New World, The Tree of Life. It's the same visual poetry, the combination of beautiful images and voiceover, but I think in the context of the individual films the result is quite different. Whereas in The Thin Red Line there is this amazing antithesis between the cruelty of war and the beauty of nature/the fragility of men, the same 'language' turns this movie into a farce. Contrary to what I said earlier I think you are right in the respect that Malick is not entirely romanticising Native Americans over the British, hence why Pocahontas goes to live a (sort of happy) life in England at the end. Still I think that the whole romance in nature thing is definitely too close to kitsch to begin with, which is made worse by the fact that the editing is a mess - too much stuff in there that's just unnecessary and confusing. I was really excited about it when I heard it came out, but I just can't find anything good about this movie. At worst it has a stupid message, at best it doesn't know what message it has.

Picture of HwCath

HwCath

6Apr12

Too beautiful for words. It's something that has to be seen on the big screen. Fuck iphones. They won't capture the essences of the new world.

Harry Rossi likes this

Bret Bynum

6Apr12

Just watched this again. I have always loved this film but not more so than I did when I just watched it. It had me in a trance, with my eyes glued to the screen. It's so beautiful! So romantic! And it's narration, especially Pocahontas' narration, moved me and was incredibly poetic! Malick is a rare director where every one of his films are one of his best, because they are all masterpieces!

Related Films

Fans

Displaying 5 of 1492 fans.

Articles

Our roundup of essays and articles on this film.
W184

Terrence Malick’s “The Tree of Life”: A Few Thoughts Subsequent to a Local Screening Sponsored by a College’s Theology Department

By Joe McCulloch on October 11, 2011

On the occasion of its video release.

read article
W184

"The Tree of Life": A Malickiad

By Ignatiy Vishnevetsky on May 27, 2011

In The Tree of Life, we know that Brad Pitt’s unnamed, self-styled paterfamilias is a light smoker not because it’s ever said or

read article
W184

Terrence Malick in NYC and LA

By David Hudson on May 12, 2011

Updated through 5/24. "Each Terrence Malick film concerns a lost or squandered Eden," writes Michael Joshua Rowin in the LA Weekly: "the

read article

Lists

Displaying 5 of 528 lists.

Reviews

Displaying 4 of 7

Beautiful poetry.

By MisterN​ovember on August 31, 2011

The New World, director Terrence Malick’s fourth film and fourth breathtaking masterpiece, is many things. It’s a historical exploration of what occurred when the first European explorers clashed with…  read review

Visually stunning but emotionally vapid. New World

By earman on September 29, 2010

I have been anticipating seeing this film for months. I admire Terrence Malick’s previous 3 films,“Badlands”,“Days of Heaven” and “Thin Red Line”.“The New World” starts on a promising note with the…  read review

My Number 1 Film of the Decade.

By Ian Robinso​n on August 4, 2010

Cinema is a visual art, first and foremost. And no other film in this decade, or several others, has been so richly and brilliantly visual. It almost could be a silent film, given Malick’s astonishing…  read review

The New World of storytelling in cinema

By H. Paul Moon on January 28, 2010

There is the cliche of remarking that you’ve just seen the best movie ever made. It’s usually a moment of adrenaline or fashion-consciousness, and the grandeur is eclipsed by your next favorite movie…  read review

Forum

Displaying 2 discussion topics.

Which Cut?

16 posts by 14 people 6 months ago

The Impossibility of History

31 posts by 9 people about 1 year ago