Watch unlimited films online for $6.99.
Try MUBI for FREE.
 

Synopsis

A useless and bloody vendetta has been going on for ages between two families in this mexican village. Men, sons, have killed each other for generations, for a so-called conception of honor in a revenge that never ends since it is also triggered by people of the village.

Now, today, there are only two sons left, one in each family. One has become a doctor in the big city and his culture is modern. The other last one – of the other family – hasn’t left the village and is waiting for the doctor to come “home” as he plans to kill him, to settle this war on this matter of honor once and for all. And the people of the village want blood.

When the doctor finally comes to the village, because of his mother influenced by the villagers, he faces the other son who challenges his courage. First he refuses, but they have this fight on the island across the river. Just wounds. Finally the doctor convinces his opponent to make peace in front of the whole village and not listen to the opinion of the other villagers. –IMDb

Director

Original

Luis Buñuel

Sent off for a Jesuit education by his prosperous Spanish parents, Luis Buñuel went on to attend the University of Madrid, where he first became interested in the burgeoning European film industry. Upon graduating from Paris’ Academie du Cinema, his first movie job was as an assistant to French-based directors Jean Epstein and Mario Nalpas. In partnership with an old friend, Spanish painter/sculptor Salvador Dali, Buñuel put together the three-reel surrealist masterpiece Un Chien Andalou (1928), the film that features dead donkeys on a piano, a razor slashing an eyeball, and other deliberately shocking images that cineastes have either praised or damned for the past seven decades.

Buñuel’s first feature film, L’Age d’Or, was banned from public exhibition almost immediately from the moment of its 1930 premiere; its principal opponents were high-ranking members of the Catholic church, who condemned the film as savagely sacrilegious. After 1932’s Land Without Bread, an uncompromising… read more

Wall

Displaying 1 wall posts.
Picture of ramosbarajas

ramosbarajas

25May12

The biggest mistake, I think, one can make while watching Mexican Buñuel is watching it with a European or Late Buñuel lens. Yes, it's true Buñuel had a strong sense of what was wrong with society, and that criticism is clear while watching his last films. But, watching these films without a Mexican lens leaves you nothing but plot. You can try to find his slurs against religion or government, but it would be stupid.

  • Picture of ramosbarajas

    ramosbarajas

    25May12

    That said, it is a well made film. It fits in with a topic you would probably find in an Emilio Fernandez film (He is the other big Mexican director). And that is, education as a salvation for the nation. The town, corrupted by feuds and violence, needs to escape that in order for progress. But one cannot just abandon a lifestyle. Education here is the answer. As Buñuel mentioned sometime, the theme is rather heavy-handed. But the mastery of the technical aspects make this a film worth watching. Especially for a sequence in particular where two bitter enemies travel together to the burial of an eminent old man because as one of the men says "you don't have to be friends to share the same road"

  • Picture of ramosbarajas

    ramosbarajas

    25May12

    Also, it is probably one of the most homoerotic films from Golden Age Mexican Cinema I have seen thus far.

Related Films