Welcome to MUBI.
Your online cinema. Anytime, anywhere.

Reviews of Youth in Revolt

Displaying all 3 reviews

back to Youth in Revolt

MR. Univers​e

6Nov10

If you are a fan of the books. The film may leave you disappointed after all there are 5 of them. The first one of which is 800 + pages and this is a movie that is under 90 minutes. So a lot of subplots and characters are dropped and so is the original ending. So the film plays as a greatest hits version of the book using only it’s bare bones framing. In a way since there are so many books this could have been the directors 400 Blows. Just like how Francois Truffaut kept bringing us Antione Doinel in BED & BOARD, This character could have come back in sequels the only problem is that the books take place in the span of only a few years and by the time they would film these movies the actors would begin to look a little long in the tooth unless it was a instant blockbuster and like the HARRY POTTER films began filming back to back.

I applaud the cast and filmmakers for letting the film have a identity of it’s own.

I am a fan of the book and must say I enjoyed the film. Yes I was a bit disappointed but could still enjoy the film as it’s own entity. If you like the film with it’s wild original spirit both dangerous and sweet at the same time, then you should love the book. Whixh is more outrageous, Perverse and witty. Ok I will stop Plugging the book so much and move onto the review.

The film follows the attempts of Nick Twisp a too smart for his own good teenager who falls in love on a vacation with his mother and her latest loser boyfriend. Then spends the rest of the movie not only trying to charm the girl of his dreams Sheeni but his Attempts and mischievous plans to reunite with her once the vacation is over. Plus keep her away form her perfect boyfriend.

Though the films is aimed at teens it feels like it would appeal more to adults. There is a cuteness in the film that thankfully never crosses into smugness but the film does lack a certain depth. As things happen they seem random. No Passion seems like it was exerted by anyone. Not even the characters in there scenes seem to have a natural emotional nature. There also seems to be a lack of chemistry that actually plays into the awkwardness of the script.

The big names in the film or character actors seem to be in only a few scenes. Sort of like glorified cameos. Fred Willard even gets a special appearance credit. Which makes the film seem more like a made for television project then a feature film. It makes you winder if the character actors were in more scenes that were cut. Leading to the thought that since the film is only 90 minutes if it was heavily edited down.

Michael Cera does play his usual Awkward self as Nick Twisp but as his alter ego Francois Dillinger he has more freedom and puts in a effort to create a comedic character. I would like to see more of this from him. I would have loved if the film had more of his character throughout the film because when he is on screen you know the scene will be hilarious. The character plays into many French stereotypes. He is tougher and cooler then Nick. Really his id. He also never blinks literally and physically. So he just has a stare.

The film is a satisfying rental but I wouldn’t blame you if you purchased it, But used or marked down. It has a certain charm and a Rewatchable quality.

  • Currently 3.0/5 Stars.
Picture of plaidgorilla

plaidgo​rilla

22Jul10

Yes, Michael Cera is playing the same role again and trying to get laid, but this time he’s part badass. The movie makes itself seem like the crimes he’s committed are extremely serious and drastic, but overall the film, of course, works around itself in favor of Michael Cera’s character. The scenes in which the film is funny is damn hilarious but most of the movie is quiet. It comes off as trying wayyyy to hard.

  • Currently 3.0/5 Stars.
Picture of jaredmobarak

jaredmo​barak

6Jan10

Wow, never underestimate the drawing power of Michael Cera. This kid is the most awkward looking and acting actor on the planet, destined to be relegated to one-trick pony status unless he stops letting himself be typecast, but my God does he have comedic appeal. The screening I attended for Youth in Revolt was sold out almost an hour in advance, something unheard of and definitely worthy of mention. You’d think people would be sick of him by now—I know I am—but the glimmer of hope that his character Nick’s alternate persona Francois could grow some hair on the chest of his boyish innocence was too strong to resist. And you won’t be disappointed in that department; Cera’s creepily wide eyes, prepubescent moustache, and uninhibited actions are a laugh riot. Unfortunately, too much of his nerdiness still comes through the façade of cool, not enough to make this otherwise pretentiously dialogued, long-winded tale without merit though—it’s deserving of a look for sure.

Miguel Arteta has had his hand in creating some very good subtle comedy, oftentimes pairing with Mike White’s talents as writer, actor, or both. Arteta was behind the camera on The Good Girl and a brilliant short film Are You the Favorite Person of Anybody?, not to mention some episodes of the dramedy “Six Feet Under”. In other words, he knows how to get laughs while remaining poignant and reserved. So, seeing him involved with Revolt was a bit surprising to me, especially since they had billed the trailers to be an uproarious comedy with “that dude from The Hangover”, (hate to break it to you, but Zach Galifianakis is only onscreen for about ten minutes). However, the actual film is a nice hybrid of styles, definitely the most purposeful comedy he’s done, yet still retaining indie sensibilities and artistic flourishes. I forgive the overzealous use of slomotion—especially since it’s utilized so cautiously, not too slow that it’s added for dramatic effect or big laughs, but just slow enough to be noticeable and beg the question why—because I actually enjoyed the charmingly crude animation sequences, as well as the humorous quasi-splitscreen of pitting both Ceras in frame together, distinctly dissimilar to one another.

On to the film itself, the main plot concerns a soft-spoken, too nice 16-year old that has just met the girl of his dreams. Thanks to the deadbeat boyfriend of his mother, frightened by the three sailors he sold a lemon car too, the trio go to the woods to camp, causing fate to allow for the stars’ alignment and Nick meeting Portia Doubleday’s Sheeni Saunders. She is cut from the same cloth as he, in love with French New Wave while he Italian cinema and playing Serge Gainsbourg records to his Frank Sinatra—they are soulmates of the intellectual elite. Even their parents are similar in the fact their children are aliens to them; Nick’s are borderline trailer trash and Sheeni’s are religious kooks, neither quite the breeding ground for stimulating, unbiased discourse. But, while their delicate tastes are congruent, their lifestyles are not. Sheeni wants an adventurous future with a man full to brim in confidence and strength, two things any Cera character is lacking in immensely. Francois Dillinger is therefore introduced into the fold as the man Nick never had the guts to be. He’s an unruly juvenile delinquent and sexual deviant, a perfect combination for some good fun.

I really liked the supporting cast going along for the ride, despite their limited involvement. Jean Smart has been playing the unbalanced, aging beauty queen to perfection for years now; Steve Buscemi seems to be filling out the loudmouth, hard-nosed parental figure this year, which is weird considering his own gawky build; and Fred Willard is brilliant with the laughs, that voice of his with its ever-fluctuating volume made for comedy. Adhir Kalyan is starting to make a name for himself of late, here playing a Brit and kindred spirit of Nick’s, helping him get into more trouble; Erik Knudsen, as our lead’s best friend Lefty, is the perfect amount of awkward obsessive; and, frankly, it’s just always great seeing M. Emmet Walsh in front of the camera. As for our leading lady, I thought Doubleday did quite the job pulling off that wiser than her years’ attitude, the muse behind the destruction that’s definitely worth the effort. She is a little Lolita, casting her spell on Nick in such a way that it wouldn’t surprise you if she pulled the rug out and crushed him for his troubles. Quite the enigma, she seems to also be caught under his spell … boy would I like to know how he manages that one.

And that brings us to the indispensable work of one Michael Cera. It never ceases to amaze that he can play the same role over and over again, but do it so well that you sometimes forget you’ve seen it before. No one can deliver the lines he is given with better timing or biting sarcastic wit. It also doesn’t hurt that he is so natural in his actions and expressions. He can get away with stuff like oddly crossed forearms or goofy, free-form arm-flailing when at a run, even eliciting a laugh rather than a scowl at is unoriginality. There is a sense of empathy with him, memories of a time when you yourself were that strange and introverted. I absolutely loved his reaction to getting kissed post-dog smooch by Sheeni, but I enjoyed Francois’s oneliners and idiosyncrasies more. Just the way he smoked his cigarette, putting it to his mouth cupped in his palm and than out again, gripped between his ring and pinkie finger is mesmerizing. The addition of the pinkie ring and carefree attitude make this imagined miscreant my new hero. As for the pinkie itself, well I won’t mention where its other adventures lay—animated hilarity.

Youth in Revolt 7/10

http://jaredmobarakreviews.wordpress.com/2010/01/05/youth-in-revolt/

  • Currently 3.0/5 Stars.