A Touch of Buddhism
By: Kim Packard
Created December 2009

Ashura, the multi-tasker, National Treasure … Kofuku-ji , Nara, Japan 734 CE
Robert Thurman interview- The Nitty Gritty of Nirvana
GLENN: But teaching Buddhism isn’t the same thing as a “revolution,” necessarily. Buddhism tends to be regarded, in the United States, anyway, as a nice therapy, not a force for social change.
THURMAN: Well, you know, the Buddha was one of the few great religious leaders who was never persecuted or executed, because he knew the art of the possible, he was a very effective administrator and strategist. He was a prince, and in those days princes weren’t trained to be comparative literature professors, or poets; if he hadn’t gone over the wall, so to speak, he would have been a general. So he realized that he couldn’t just say, “We’re going to rule India according to the Buddhist ethic, and let’s give up our armies,” and so forth. He would have been crushed. Instead he founded the monastery, this very countercultural institution that exerted a slow and steady influence on many societies over the following centuries. And the sangha, the community, he founded was a sort of nation-within-a-nation in which the principles of individualism, nonviolence, personal evolutionism, simplicity, equal access to enlightenment, altruism, and pragmatism held sway. And if lots of people really started trying to live by these principles, we’d have a revolution on our hands.
Also, I want to point out that these ideals fit in very nicely with what we think of as “American” ideals of freedom, civility, pluralism, altruism, generosity, faith in human development, and individualism. We don’t need to call it a “Buddhist” movement, if that alienates people. The point of my book, which I’m writing all over again, by the way, is to say, look, given the fact that we live in an extremely free society, the idea that we can just sit on the sidelines and criticize everything “they” do is irresponsible, it’s unenlightened, and it’s un-Buddhist. There comes a time when you have to step in and take responsibility. We need to get up off our Zen pillows and mobilize active Buddhist participation in American politics. We need to speak out, we need to engage our opponents in dialogue, and we need to vote for the closest thing we can find to our principles. The Tibetan Buddhist movement in this country is only 15 or 20 years old, but I think it can become a very effective movement, and I think it’s very necessary right now.
-
01King Hu
-
02Kenji Mizoguchi
-
03Kim Ki-duk
-
04Kon Ichikawa
-
05Hong Sang-soo
-
06Werner Herzog
-
07Anders Østergaard
-
08Naomi Kawase
-
09Pema Tseden
-
10Atsushi Funahashi
-
11Masaki Kobayashi
-
12Kenji Mizoguchi
-
13Shôhei Imamura
-
14King Hu
-
15Im Kwon-taek
-
16Bae Yong-Kyun
-
17Khyentse Norbu
-
18Kihachiro Kawamoto
-
19Kihachiro Kawamoto
-
20Kihachiro Kawamoto
-
21Kihachiro Kawamoto
-
22Kenneth Bi
-
23Jeon Soo-il
-
24Im Kwon-taek
-
25Jang Sun-woo
-
26Neten Chokling
-
27Martin Scorsese
-
28Liliana Cavani
-
29Naoki Katô
-
30A Da
-
31Luigi Falorni
-
32Khyentse Norbu
-
33Olaf de Fleur Johannesson
-
34Clara Law
-
35Doris Dörrie
-
36Bernardo Bertolucci
-
37Edward A. Burger
-
38Lynn True
-
39Apichatpong Weerasethakul
-
40Luc Schaedler
-
41Marc Rosenbush
-
42Frank Capra
-
43Yoon Yong-kyu
-
44Tsai Ming-liang
-
45Kon Ichikawa
-
46Akio Jissoji
-
47Akio Jissoji
-
48Akio Jissoji
-
49Apichatpong Weerasethakul
-
50Kōzō Morishita
-
51Larry Jordan
-
52Pan Nalin
-
53Te Wei
-
54Kenji Misumi
-
55James Broughton
-
56Tian Zhuangzhuang
-
57Kenji Mizoguchi
-
58Kaushik Ray
-
59Teinosuke Kinugasa