Watch unlimited films online for $6.99.
Try MUBI for FREE.
 
All Topics  »

Thin Red Line- The Original Cut- RELEASE IT CRITERION?!!!

Redrum4

almost 3 years ago

I’m sure Malick would be willing to release the footage in a supplement, and I wouldn’t doubt if he would be willing to release full cut of what was orignally shot and scripted, similar to what the Apacolypse Now Redux was.

Pooka

almost 3 years ago

Moderated

Pooka

almost 3 years ago

Moderated

David Guzman

almost 3 years ago

I remember reading that a cameraman on the New World asked Malick about releasing a six hour version of the Thin Red Line but Malick said that it was too hard for him to go back to something that he’d loved so much and had it tampered with. He said the distributors forced him to cut it down to the two hour forty minute length (hence the elliptical feel of the last third).

Matt Parks

almost 3 years ago

He said the distributors forced him to cut it down to the two hour forty minute length (hence the elliptical feel of the last third).

Malick had final cut, so, again, the notion that the he was “forced” to cut the film doesn’t make sense. It’s my sense that this is sort of the cinematic equivalent of an urban myth. If anybody can site a source as to Malick having to make cuts not of his own volition, I’d love to see it.

Redrum4

almost 3 years ago

Here’s a link to an online petition to 20th Cent Fox to Release the Final Cut

http://new.petitiononline.com/ttrlcut/petition.html

Paul Maher Jr.

over 2 years ago

Malcik’s intentions were to release another completely different film at 2.5 hrs. long. Look for Nick Nolte’s interview with Charlie Rose where he alludes to that.

Paul Maher Jr.

over 2 years ago

also, Malick told a cameraman for The New World that he concurs with releasing a longer cut of TTRL, but that “some things are best left alone for a while.”

His while just happens to be over ten years later . . .

George Kaplan

over 2 years ago

I remember reading a story about Adrian Brody going to see the premiere with his parents. He was so proud of his work in the film thinking he had one of the lead roles. When the film started and he realized that his performance had been cut to pieces he just shrunk down in his seat.

I would love to see any extended cut of this film. It was my favorite film of the year (much better than Pvt. Ryan) and it’s current running time flies by. Sometimes Final cut on a film requires a set running time . The studio says deliver it under 3 hours and you get to cut it your way, which might’ve happened in this case.

Anyways can’t wait for the Tree of Life this spring.

Jazzalo​ha

over 2 years ago

Is the current version the one Malick wanted? To me, that’s the main question, and enough has been said in this thread to leave some dougts. Even if Malick had final cut, he could have made decisions due to pressure from executives that he otherwise would not have done. I want to see the film he wanted to make. (Btw, I’m not really interested in seeing the cut made by the editor without Malick’s input.)

Btw, I agree with steamboat about Malick’s films. TTRL is definitely a kind of philosophical poem, more than a conventional narrative. I think you really need to listen and ponder the content of the voiceovers and the dialogue—which is really hard to do seeing it at a theater—and see how it connects with the visual aspects of the film. Well, that’s my feeling anyway, because I haven’t been able to breakdown the scenes and hone in on the written qualities of it. Luckily I have a copy of the dvd.

Paul Maher Jr.

over 2 years ago

Well, look at it like this. Malick had final cut, this is true. That being said, the cut that was edited and released was in agreement with theatre owners etc. to keep it under three hours for theatrical running time. So, Malick hacked away at it till the last minute. However, he does have a longer cut that he could foresee being released at some time. I would think that with the medium of Blu-Ray etc., that that is a very real possibility. Since his time and attention are focused on Tree of Life, my bet is if that film hits it big, or wins awards or brings his work more into the public eye, Fox will want to re-release this, either as a deluxe release of the theatrical version, or the extended cut. Or both.

My extensive research on this and other Malick films for my book on Malick leads me to believe this with confidence.

Jazzalo​ha

over 2 years ago

I hope you’re right, Paul.

Btw, I watched the Nolte interview. Fascinating. Anybody know of any other interviews? (I understand Malick doesn’t give interviews.)

Morris Stuttar​d

over 2 years ago

Great link to the Nolte interview about Malick and TRL – thanks. For others, the exact url is:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FOvt8iPi7M

Parvule​sco

over 2 years ago

From criterionforum.org

“I can’t disclose too much information, but a source has told me that Criterion is in the middle of restoring The Thin Red Line under supervision of Terrance Malick and they hope to get it out by the end of the year. This source is extremely reliable so I would believe what they say.”

I sure hope so!

Jazzalo​ha

over 2 years ago

I really hope this is true!

Morris Stuttar​d

over 2 years ago

Great stuff Dan – do keep us posted if you hear anything more on this.

Redrum4

over 2 years ago

That is AMAZING DAN!!!!!!

Please- PLEASE keep us posted. I would be dying to see Thin Red Line on Criterion uncut, in all of its glory.

juan jose namnun

over 2 years ago

that may be the best thing to come out blu ray yet…a longer (not necessarily better) version of the best American war movie…

Drew Gregory

over 2 years ago

:O

(^mouth literally did that)

Matt Parks

over 2 years ago

I’m holding out until I can see every from of the million and a half feet of film Malick shot.

Seriously, though, does anyone have any idea as to the credibility of this poster on the Criterion forum? Or is it just some random guy rumormongering?

Regarding much-hypothosized-about extended version, is no one dubious of the notion that more is more, particularly since the arc of Malick’s career suggest that the opposite is true? Me, I suppose that, as Michael Atkinson put it, "we are unlikely to see “alternate” versions of Malick’s masterpiece, whether formally more traditional or less, but even if we do, I doubt I’ll ever surrender my ardor for the woozy, meditative, heartbroken film with which Malick ended up, whatever its provenance. "

Parvule​sco

about 2 years ago

It’s official!

http://i4.createsend5.com/ei/r/4C/F8B/C2F/052221/wacky-thinredlion.jpg

Roscoe

about 2 years ago

Hmmmm. Well, we’ll see. I saw the release version in its inital release, in a good theatre, and was very impressed, and have since found the film virtually impossible to watch on DVD, the diminished size of even the best TV screen is just insurmountable. This film needs to be seen BIG.

I’ll probably buy it, I guess.

NE1

about 2 years ago

YESSSSSS!!! Thank the heavens!!

My excitement is tantamount to my joy.

Matt Parks

about 2 years ago

-It’s official!-

Not exactly official. And still no details about whether or not this is the theatrical cut or some alternate version.

Borowcz​yk76

about 2 years ago

I was going to post that “Thin Red Lion” myself! :)

Matt Parks

about 2 years ago

Maybe it’s Andrew Marton’s The Thin Red Line :)

Redrum4

about 2 years ago

Okay, do you have any sources that would merit you saying- “It’s official!!!”?

The Cellulo​id Alchemi​st

about 2 years ago

OK for those who know:

Is the Thin Red Line officially going to be released on Criterion or what?

Redrum4

about 2 years ago

Criterion is so damned secretive that there’s really no way to know until an official press release goes out.

elmer_f​ishstic​ks

about 2 years ago

No indication that it’ll be the original 6 hour cut. I wonder if it’ll ever see the light of day. It’s certainly a depressing thought that it may be never surface.