Early Edvard Munch must have been an inspiration at least partially.
It’s not just the scenes, the poses, it’s also how figures merge with darkness…




Compare this to the above:


I wonder if these sharp contrasts between light and darkness are the result of bad quality of the print (partially, they are) or Sjostrom meant it to be a little bit over-exposed?
dAvril
You would probably agree it’s an AAA-rated film.
But what exactly makes it look so magical? I can’t get hold of that. There is nothing special (apart from the double exposure trick). Each frame is so perfectly simple.
So what is the secret?