http://cinematicadoration.blogspot.com/
http://cinematicadoration.blogspot.com/
on your review of chloe, did you see SECRETARY? the same scriptor as chloe. i think you under-rate the scriptor, who seems to be a good writer to me. what draws me about chloe is also its script. for example, the conversation chloe has with catherine on the sports-field, and her comment on the internet and downloaded music. and lots of people fail to understand the ending.
I haven't seen The Secretary, so I'm not really familiar with her work outside of Chloe. I don't disagree with you though, I do think it's a well-crafted screenplay, but I was drawn more into the film because of its directorial touches. I didn't love the film in comparison to the rest of the director's work, probably because it's a little too conventional and genre-specific for my taste (and his style). I do agree with you about the ending, I don't think a lot of people were able to piece together some of the details. Thank you for reading the review, though!
I haven’t read Stieg Larsson’s novels nor have I seen the Swedish films, however, I have seen the film a lot of people are mistakenly calling a remake. David Fincher’s adaptation of The Girl with the… read review
Atom Egoyan is known for his non-linear narratives and an unconventional method of telling a story. In each of his films, he presents a series of characters that, at first, seem unrelated but as the… read review
I stood outside the theatre before the screening, reading a promotional poster for The Fighter (2010). There was some good word from the studio, attempting to hype up the film by comparing it to Rocky… read review
Darren Aronofsky does things his own way. In this day and age, while every other filmmaker has made the switch to digital cameras, the young auteur is stepping back in time and working with Super 16mm… read review