Para uma melhor experiência no MUBI, atualize seu navegador.

Cannes 2012. Ulrich Seidl’s “Paradise: Love”

The first part in a trilogy of films on “paradise” by Austrian director Ulrich Siedl. Love focuses on sex tourism in Kenya.
Paradise: Love
In Paradise: Love, the first part of a trilogy of films by Austrian filmmaker Ulrich Seidl, the camera is entirely presentational. It says: here is this! The story is of a female tourist (Margarethe Tiesel) who travels to Kenya and very quickly, whether by original intent or not, begins to look not for a quick lay but for something like “love” among the readily available population of male prostitutes. What is before the camera is like documentary: all real locals, real spaces, practices—all research. The rest, of course, is fiction, and it is the fiction which addresses us like so: let me show you this! It is an excitable filmmaking, one suffuse with its enjoyment of delivering discovery. Nearly every shot exists with an originator: we see how we get to a place, and that place is always a something.
Of the story itself—of, basically, a sex tourist, of what the local population hounds tourists for and asks of them (seen, of course, from the tourist's point of view), and what a tourist asks of them, of the ironies, hypocrisies and blindnesses of the trade—little is surprising or risky, and indeed the revelations proceed as if practically a genre itself, films of 21st century sex tourism. The initial surprise of the offerings, the laughing dismissal yet growing curiosity of the tourist, the transactional nature of everything, even of the shot, where nearly no shot exists without a point of view dialog between the tourist and a local (even if the audience, observant to ironies, stands in for that local), all is what one would imagine of such a story. This mix between the expected or conventional and continual discoveries lends for a remarkably discomfiting film, an awkwardness or conflict presented often scene by scene, a kind of clash not just of the drama but even of the staging of the drama, this kind of story shot where it is with these people, on "location" and "real." It makes the very idea of tourism and even of filming tourism as something awkward, unnatural, compromised and conflicted.
It is Seidl's filmmaking, not the story, that constitutes the discovery, the presentation of spaces, real but framed wholly, with geometric precision, as if parceled out, each an element unto itself with its own key observations: the symmetry of sunbathers, the line in the sand dividing a resort from the local population, an apartment into rooms, the intrusion of live monkeys into a staged shot, the deep purple of Kenyan twilight (captured in 35mm), the image of a sleeping odalisque, seen above, of the supposedly ugly, overweight and old Austrian tourist instead a thing of extreme beauty.
All is as if the world is a whole and contiguous (as we see how one parcel leads to another) but each also a thing, discoverable, containable, remarkable and fact-filled, situation and location based, textured by color, geometry, light. One shot of Tiesel at her hotel uses the black and white painting of a leopard above her bed to pull out the black and white grid of the bed's wicker headboard; a later shot from the same angle has taken a step back and instead pulls the pink the bed's curtains by revealing, quietly, the pink in wallpaper unseen in the previous shot. Here, each shot tells a story, silent cinema style, and Seidl's cinema resembles the railroad-like cinema construction of the silents. Yet he is not just presentational; this presentation confronts, each room is almost like an accusation, hovering between a declaration and a challenge. Kept in check by Tiesel's marvelous performance, by turns purposefully naïve as a tourist yet funnily canny and clever when flirtatious, when she attempts to get past the prostitution and force a human relationship from the exchange—especially in a terrific sequence where she teachs her “beach boy” subtleties of German grammar and how to softly stroke not two breasts but one—the confrontations of Paradise: Love are never attacks, stunts or gimmicks. All seem rooted in a reality fairly intruded upon, packaged, connected, opened up but intentionally directed, assembled and delivered.
Strangely, it all seems fair, a middle ground between things, like with Herzog, pushing for a more immediate, brutal truth, uncomfortable but grounded. This duality is also what Herzog gets at, compromising reality for a purpose, rooting fiction in facts, making you aware of a blended line between two worlds; that is Herzog's synthesis. Paradise: Love is not after synthesis: Seidl's story is smooth but the intrusion on the world he has chosen to explore (or burden his film with) does nothing less than confront that difficult line, a formal strategy that pulses out into the surrounding story material as this sense of discovery and confrontation, re-activating the expected and electrifying it.
interesting article, this looks great! cant wait to see it
Cool review. Absence of spoilers is always welcome.
I have not seen the film, but I thought the main character in PARADIES / LIEBE is Margarethe Tiesel? Any which way, thank you very much for your observations - c
Ah you are right, Christoph, thanks! I was confusing her with one of the female character’s who overlap into the other Paradise movies.
would love to see this film on dvd
because i think that URlich Siedl is a very underated director who deserves more praise for his fine work in the past.
Ah! I thought you meant you specifically wanted to see the film on DVD, not in theaters! :)
yes i would love tp see this film on DVD
Very cool write up, exactly my thoughts. This is, in my opinion, mostly a technical achievement. How to create engaging fiction? Other reviews have seen this as a failed attack on the “socio-political problem of sex tourism”, but I think it’s more about compassion, fantasy, and sex. It was very easy for me to project my own desires in the characters. Another reviewer compared some scenes to Cassavetes’ Husbands. He’s not wrong. It’s very much about trying to understand the characters first than chastising them for their choices. Also the nudity in the film totally shifts our typical expectations of physical desire. Well played Ulrich, well played … Thanks D-Kas!
Oooh, Husbands, that’s interesting! Thanks for the comment Hugo!

Please to add a new comment.

Previous Features