3X3D

herb shellenberger

The Greenaway short was the only one that took advantage of the project. Creating a spatial film that works across a "physical dimension" (at least perceived), he extends his work conceptual into the spatial dimension of time, looking at how history can be read and interpreted through a physical space.

Marc St-Cyr (Death cinéphilia)

Holidays Break # 12: (Only the Godard's section) Damn, i know Godard did better short-essay-films in this century. This one feels like a burrito in a mixer. Need to see it in 3D.

Adam Cook

Greenaway - 2/5, Godard - 5/5, Pera - 1/5

Yusef

Even though the lack of conceptual unity among the 3 films is rather a flaw, to see the use of 3D technology in new ways is a sort of first contact with new layers of the language, very sad to see a postmodernism+cinema 101 feature for teenagers right after godard's terrific essay.

Sara Marques

I really think that, for a 3D movie - which is a new technique for them -, and having in mind that they probably didn't have the best budget for it, these are 3 nice ideas.

ManüelSilva

Greenaway's part was quite good at exploring the potential of 3D technology in a city I am very fond of. Edgar Pêra's short film had a quite interesting start; it was such a shame that it turned out to be so very awful. Godard's pretensiousness was unbearable, that's all I have to say.

joana geraldo

greenaway: ~ w o r d A r t p A r T y ~

João Eça

0 stars for both Greenaway and Pêra, 2 stars for Godard.