63/100 (Önceden izlediğimde 80 puan vermiştim. Belki izlerken çok heyecan verici olabilir, yapıldığı yıla göre iyi bir iş de olabilir ancak o yılların gözüyle baksam da iyi bir film diyemem. Bu sefer dikkatlice izledim. Bir çok soru cevapsız bırakılmış, oyuncular berbatın ötesine geçmiş, en kötüsü ise böylesi bir canavarı bağlamamak gibi fahiş hataların tekrar edilmesi olmuş. )
FRANKENSTEIN - maybe - not as great as some people said. I felt the storytelling itself is too "jumpy", I guess. It went too fast you know. I had no idea. Maybe the editing technique or knowledge back then isn't good enough like today. It is still a decent movie. FRANKENSTEIN still have something that I loved. I really loved its gothic cinematography. And of course Boris Karloff as the Monster himself. WORTH WATCHING
I was completely disappointed for it is so different from the book and everything happens so fast. Elizabeth is as annoying as in Shellye's story. Anyway, the Cinematography is amazing and I loved Frankenstein's mad lab. It should have had more of him and the monster and less, way less of his annoying father and nosy elizabeth.
Boris Karloff sure can play both sides of an inconsistent character, can't he? Question; are people meant to be the real monsters of this movie? Because where they see an abomination, I see someone who'd been imprisoned, burnt, whipped, and scared from the day he was born. I first read Frankenstein as a kid and it left a very vivid impression. This just doesn't cut it as an adaptation; I'm sorry.
Iconic stuff! The opening scenes in the graveyard, against the gaunt skies, is forever burnt into my abnormal brain, as is, of course, the creation scenes in the greatest of all mad scientist labs! I was blown away as a kid over the fact that they actually kill a little girl in this movie. That's some freakin' balls, man!!!