Sex. Art. Commerce. Discuss. Familiar themes (almost sub-headings with this director) in different contexts and a return to Greenaway's overlapping masque-like mode. It's a visually stimulating essay on questions (draw your own answers) of representation, depiction and convention, notably of sex - which sells apparently. Same old, same old - in a few senses here - but it's a thrilling often anti-clerical ride.
This dizzying mix of "Prospero's" multi-media phantasmagoria & "Mâcon's" Brechtian dissertation on voyeurism is also Greenaway's clearest statement on the nature of cinema & its roots in picture-making & performance. In this conception, Goltzius becomes a prototypical-moviemaker struggling against financiers, critics & censorship to achieve a vision every bit as daring, creative & confrontational as the film itself.
Greenaway can be great and he can be awful. In this case he's great, teasing away at hypocrisy about taboos and the 'limits of liberality'. It is timely(since Enlightenment values are under attack across the globe), astute and amusing. Droll and beautifully composed (his 'cinema of image') with typical humour on show; my favourite line being the exasperated Margrave expostulating "dynastic pawns don't fall in love!"
FNC '13 Greenaway returns in all his excessive glory with this overwhelming artistic triumph that pushes the envelope in so many ways. As always a revelation in art direction, cinematography, music and the use of editing technology. F. Murray Abraham has his best role in years as a Margrave being presented six pornographic biblical enactments for his patronage. A film about free speech, eroticism and voyeurism.