For a better experience on MUBI, update your browser.

Ratings & Reviews

  1. Bob's rating of the film In the Mouth of Madness

    Arguably, the most lovecraftian movie out there. But, it doesn't just introduce the Old Ones, but also expands narration in ways that are so experimental, that the line between sanity and madness is blurred to a nightmarish proportions. And it doesn't stop there, it also distorts perception on reality and fiction, until the movie itself looks back at the audience. And it winks as Carpenter's most ambitious work.

  2. Udo N. Owen's rating of the film In the Mouth of Madness

    Die Mächte des Wahnsinns bildet zusammen mit den Fürsten der Finsternis eine wunderbare Sinfonie des Grauens. Düsterer, bedrohlich und richtig gutes Handwerk! 8/10

  3. MisterColo93's rating of the film In the Mouth of Madness

  4. FISCHER's rating of the film In the Mouth of Madness

    Carpenter for ever ! www.cinefiches.com

  5. Dan Kenneth Gigernes's rating of the film In the Mouth of Madness

    The last well done John Carpenter movie - a good blend of H.P. Lovecraft works and the success of Stephen King combined into one interesting story. Great help from many supporting cult faces and Sam Neill is engaging as a man gone bonkers from reading to much fantasy fiction. The cheap false scares ruin some of the film though.

  6. mahdis's rating of the film In the Mouth of Madness

  7. HicBitmeyenAkbil's rating of the film In the Mouth of Madness

    The exorcist and in the mouth of madness.. i think they're the best horror movies od all times.

  8. PeterK94's rating of the film In the Mouth of Madness

    I love the idea of this film, but the result is a mess.

  9. Eric Ortiz García's rating of the film In the Mouth of Madness

  10. GIYGAS's rating of the film In the Mouth of Madness

    It ends next to the place my brother had his Bar Mitzvah

  11. colortear's rating of the film In the Mouth of Madness

    Really fun for HP Lovecraft nerds

  12. Rocco's rating of the film In the Mouth of Madness

    Likely the most ingenious meta narrative ever committed to film. In casting the author as creator of an internal world that exists in the minds of the social collective and externalizing it, Carpenter posits the artist as a god. Though he's of a different stripe than the god of the Bible, he has more power to shape the cultural reality we live with day to day, warping it by the mere act of putting pen to paper.

  13. Log Lady's rating of the film In the Mouth of Madness

    I'm not a Lovecraft fan, but I thoroughly enjoyed witnessing Sam Neill's descent to madness. Cool practical effects as well, and the thin line between reality and fiction ensures there's very little predictability.

  14. Nick Schwab's rating of the film In the Mouth of Madness

    Too focused on its plot line that keeps over-complicating itself, making the film creative in its ideas, but akin to the recent Inception, causing it to muddle, not linger and settle. The Lovecraft influence is evident, but its more a homage with its setup, lacking the author's straight-told mindfuck style, not to mention consistently straight-faced dark tone and scary atmosphere, preferring a more campy approach.

  15. Henri de Corinth's rating of the film In the Mouth of Madness

    Rewatch (had not seen since I saw it in a theater in 1995). Carpenter's last 'great' film. Keep in mind you need to watch this with the episteme of someone in 1995, before the studios started trotting out pop-existential, cheap-meta, 'reality-bending' films that turned a generation of young people into faux-intellectual, 'dorm-room deep' dickhead cinephiles.

  16. spasmolytic's rating of the film In the Mouth of Madness

    Best cinematic Lovecraft I can think of, but feels very under-cooked.

  17. DenoResandono's rating of the film In the Mouth of Madness

    IN THE MOUTH OF MADNESS is a decent movie from director John Carpenter. Unfortunately, I think - it was overshadowed by his other masterpiece, such as THE THING or HALLOWEEN. Some people said this movie is heavily influenced by Lovecraft's works (which I haven't read all of his works yet). Despite its mediocre acting and awful soundtrack, it's still entertaining. This movie succeed to keep me intriguing until the end

  18. The Macho King's rating of the film In the Mouth of Madness

    Some interesting ideas here however many of them i felt wasn't executed as well as they could've been. It is moderately successful at achieving and maintaining a mood/feeling of dread throughout and some quality make up/practical effects otherwise not much else... Recommended only for people serious about Carpenter and/or Lovecraft. 2.5 - 3 star film... can't make up my mind.

  19. Renton47's rating of the film In the Mouth of Madness

    King is the obvious comparison but the ideas reminded me far more of Gaiman - imagination at the frontier of humanity's evolution, a flight from the corporeal into any number of realities... Mouth is Carpenter in a mode more meta than I had pegged him for, but it's also atypical; a man against the world, sceptical of politics and the institutions of fiction.

  20. Adam Whybray's rating of the film In the Mouth of Madness

    3.5 stars. Such a bracingly ludicrous approach is perhaps the only way to make Lovecraft palatable on screen, however counter-intuitive that might seem. Considering Sam Neal's bugged-out performance, might we consider this a kind of sequel to 'Possession' (1981), in which Mark's doppelganger has lived to become a successful horror author? It would sort of explain why his books are able to summon squamous beasties!

  21. Tyler Wright's rating of the film In the Mouth of Madness

    Extremely clever, probably too clever for its own good.

  22. Atzin Ortiz González's rating of the film In the Mouth of Madness

    An exquisite, playful and provoking labyrinth of mirrors. One of Carpenter's finest hours.

  23. ermete polpette's rating of the film In the Mouth of Madness

  24. TheCentralRuhr's rating of the film In the Mouth of Madness

    Carpenter is in both Neill's character and Cane himself, both the author and skeptic of his own work. Just like Neill, perpetually placed in a labyrinth of narratives, we find ourselves to be characters in the stories of other people's design. This is not something to escape from, but simply a condition of life in which all we can do, as the film's ending would suggest, is laugh in the face of its absurdity (cont.)

← Previous 1 3 4