Directed by the author of the original story of the same name, this movie is an antiwar sob story that lacked the production value and lightning to really get me in the proper mood to feel for the amputated nameless soldier. Perhaps I am just too spoiled by 2017 cinematography standards for movies, but the "special effects" really require a lot of imagination in order for them to work in this flick. Average at best.
Truly an anti war film, i did feel that it was a bit disturbing mainly because of Joe is trying to reach out to people but since he has no voice no one can hear him. I did feel the movie dragged a bit but I did enjoy it. I felt that the last half hour was pretty effective and powerful. Jason Robards and Donald Sutherland are both excellent and are main reasons to see this film.
Más que un filme perturbador, "Johnny cogió el fusil" es una interesante lectura existencial, esta sostenida bajo los únicos pilares de un hombre "muerto": La memoria, los sueños y la imaginación. Estas se confunden y se manifiestan como medio de escape frente a la cruda realidad (una de colores grises). Johnny reflexiona temas como la fe, el despertar sexual y la misma muerte.
I'm happy that I decided to watch this film. As someone else said, parts seemed a little dragged out. However, I think you'll either love it or hate it. I found it to be powerful and saddening. ithink it was meant to be an eye-opener for the consequences of war. I could feel John's frustration while trying to cope in his situation; but also imagining myself in his position would be enough to sink me into depression
Dalton Trumbo's muddled adaptation of his own novel takes a fascinating story and reduces it to a dull, tedious melodrama, complete with some misguided, forced attempts at surrealism. Cheaply-made with murky photography and overwrought performances - the whole film has a rushed, amateurish feel to it. A major disappointment as it's the sole directorial effort from screenwriting legend Trumbo.