I decided to watch the last film on the list without looking at the link. Having no expectations, or even knowing what I was going to watch added mystery to the experience of watching a movie. I just read that the script is verbatim from the hearing. The actor who chewed on a pen was probably thinking about his facial expressions too much in a few scenes. His self-consciousness was distracting, but he did a good job.
Sort of "docu-drama found art", in this case the "found" being the transcript of an actual public hearing regarding the replacement of a town's current WalMart with a Super WalMart. Sounds like a good time to nap but this is surprisingly engaging as well as insightful.
I don't know why this has been put under the "documentary" genre but if this is the new form of doc to oppose the generic ones coming by the dozens on our moviestream platforms then I'll most certainly welcome it. Good to be able to see alternative cinematic views from the U.S. in this detailed recreation of a public hearing regarding the expansion of Wal-Mart store in a small town at the state of New York.
Interesting visual style. The film presents two sides of a conflict, both expressing reasonable points of view, and mediators. I loved how the short break was introduced in "real" time and the music - it truly felt refreshing and gave some time to think about what was said so far... However, I feel like the actual hearing shot in 16mm b&w would have far more emotional impact. Worth giving it a try!
Amazed by this experimental b/w sort of documentary, filmed literally in accordance with the three Aristotelian rules of unity of action, place and time. Two hours of «exercise in democracy» are here fully enacted: different people - in backgrounds and needs - are passionately standing up for their opinions. Eloquent expressions and the hesitation of the camera on bored gestures are remarkable. Worth the view.
Experimental film that enacts an entire public town hearing about a Wal-Mart expansion. It's about as interesting as a town meeting would be. I can't say I was completely bored with it, but then again, the details of a hearing are somewhat interesting to me. But it's pretty bureaucratic and utterly dry.
I didn't expect that the film would be so fascinating. In showing only small details - like faces in close-up, hands, fingers playing with a pen etc. - and using no totals, Wilkins captures parts of the emotional contents and the resonances accompanying the words of the different speakers.
I thought this was going to be a boring documentary after all a detailed almost two hour film about a public hearing discussing a Walmart expansion. I was wrong. I barely saw the time go. It was so interesting to hear the different opinions of the town's people and the Walmart representatives. It made me think how difficult a decision it would be for an elected official to decide how to vote on this. Worth watching.