"The first half is much worse than I imagined," wrote Bergman. It's poor. Stagey, unconvincing, the joins showing. The action sequences are inept. Even Max von Sydow struggles as the cowardly spouse. Liv Ullmann is luminous in the better, latter part - arresting even - as the couple cling together in the chaos of war. But too many underdeveloped scene shifts and my patience ran out. I love Bergman, didn't like Shame
The familiar elements are there. Those people, that island. Even the fractious relationship remains. It's just that he's crying, and she isn't sympathetic. So he changes, but she doesn't necessarily like the new version. She just doesn't have a choice anymore. That ship has sailed.
So poignant. Turns Sweden into a generic waring country. The people he focuses on are a generic yuppie-ish couple. He brought war home. Made it not someone else's problem. Brought it home to our yuppie existence. Again, he does it simply. Economically. Underhanded. He just puts it there simply and leaves it. Doesn't force anything. Superb! Liv's performance was also outstanding. Bravo.
Bergman's most direct confrontation with war, "Shame" provides a richly textured filmic essay on the politics of neutrality, the romantic escapism of art, the wasted potential of motherhood and the demonic furor of human nature. Nykvist's cinematography is astonishing in conveying the horror of war and in presenting the enemy as a nameless calamity. Must have influenced Klimov. Acting, as always, is first-class.
Bergman in broader, uneven strokes. The human condition under more obvious strain with greater emphasis on overt cause and effect. Normality remains as precarious as ever with the vacillating military action metaphorically waxing & waning human frailty in the face of threat and - more pointedly - what eventually collapses your morality into cuckoldry when your back is against a wall. Gorgeously stark throughout.
Allégorie puissante et dénonciatrice de l'implication de la guerre, de toute guerre, sur le comportement, l'humiliation de l'être humain. Pour public averti. Le cinéma, c'est aussi quelquefois, la réflexion et le dépassement. Mais qui se sent concerné ? Une oeuvre formelle, désespérante, d'une cruelle évidence. www.cinefiches.com
Bergman's nightmare of life during wartime, just disturbing enough for when you're in the mood to be moved but not, ya know, traumatized. Some amazing setpieces and ominous atmosphere, but still linked to a kind of theatrical mannerism unbecoming for the chaos he wants to evoke. Which means, even with the Trumpocalypse bearing down, I'm less sure it's a prophecy than (for a type of arthouse viewer) good clean fun.
I liked the idea of a relationship breaking down when faced with the ever looming presence of war, but the tonal shift between the first and second half threw me a little, and the role reversal of the weak willed husband becoming the strong overbearing one, and the wife becoming the opposite, seemed rushed when explored only in an hour or less. The war themes could have been explored better, and less obscure as well.
this film is hosting lot of subtexts inside ... the hidden sexual humiliation between male and female characters is very irritating. staying indifferent towards the war or moral disappearance after war are just sheath for telling bothersome humiliation.the whole film resembles a bad nightmare but in the final scene when she started to talk about her dream ,the audience are forced to believe that this is a reality.