Un inamovible classique du cinéma fantastique précédant de peu l'arrivée du parlant, avec la présence de Luis Bunuel qui a collaboré à l'élaboration du film comme assistant à la réalisation. Cette œuvre qui fait partie du patrimoine cinématographique mondial, est de loin la meilleure adaptation et version des fameuses nouvelles d'Edgar Allan Poe. www.cinéfiches.com
The fusion of two Poe's stories doesn't work very well and the characters are not very interesting. What we have is an expressive horror film full of visual ideas but without enough drama to hold it through. The acting is too theatrical and it lacks the devastating flow of "mental images" (if I can call them that) of other Epstein films. With the exception of two or three scenes, it doesn't seem one of his films.
Cinematically powerful but dramatically weak telling of the Poe classic that deviates greatly from the original story. In terms of film language however the film is quite overwhelming in its technique for 1928 with its innovations outpacing its content. Atmospheric but not haunting...American gothic ...it's not. Add to the mix lethargic performances and you're left with all style no substance.
One of the great unsung cinematic glimpses into the world of the gothic and supernatural makes me aware how much closer this film is to Dreyer's "Vampyr. Its surreal, claustrophobic twisted darkness seems to choke all the life blood out of its characters and its use of multi-exposure unsettles everything. Epstein's work is only now being rediscovered so the world can see how brilliantly imaginative he was...
In my opinion, the Europeans can't do American Gothic. They tend to be lyrical and artier, maternal, whereas American Gothic is all horror, irony and wretchedness. Bierce, Poe or Lovecraft are all brutal and violent, more sardonic than transcendental, more open to chaos and erraticism. And they are always out of borders. French Connection: Villiers de l'Isle-Adam and Charles Baudelaire.