Filmmaker-svengali Josef von Sternberg escalates his obsession with screen legend Marlene Dietrich in this lavish depiction of sex and deceit in the 18th-century Russian court, a self-proclaimed “relentless excursion into style.”
This film is not currently playing on MUBI but 30 other great films are. See what’s now showing
"...Catherine coolly added the army to her list of conquests." someone asked me why i liked old movies. it hink i got the answer: i like old movies for the perfect overt covertness of sentences like that mentioned before.
As a young, inebriated poet careening through the world like a bull in a china shop, my friends often used to call me Catherine. After Catherine the Great. As a heterosexual man I have likewise always felt an uncustomary kinship w/ starlets and divas, often having a tendency to play the roll of holy monster. Revisiting von Sternberg's THE SCARLETT EMPRESS is like turning over in my hand a fossil of my young soul.
The Scarlet Empress is a formidable film, one that is impeccably crafted & slyly subversive. Directed by Josef von Sternberg (the first I've seen by him), a filmmaker known for both being an 'enfant terrible' for his time & an autocratic as a director, it's astonishingly well made & flourishes some of the finest aestheticism of any Hollywood picture of its time (a time which was possibly Hollywood's best). [cont.]
A wonderful melodrama, luxuriating in the decadence it purports to abhor. Hollywood actors' broad-brush take on Russian gloom and the many visions of Dietrich's face in close-up turn history into glorious soap opera; yet when the scenery dwarfs the actors it points strongly toward Eisenstein's later, and this time psychological, analysis of an earlier, and darker, period of the Russian Court.
I disagree with those who say this is von Sternberg's best film, but it is quite an achievement. The early montage sequence shows why the director was one of the finest of the silent era, and then the last half of the film shows why he is probably the best director of the 1930s. And anyone who has ever doubted the chops of Dietrich just watch the scene in which she gazes on her pathetic husband and his mistress.
It certainly is an imperfect film but yet lavishly beautiful and unique! Visually barroque, the film has an arresting effect that highy compensates for what it lacks in narrative or dialogues. And who cares, anyway! Besides, the silent era was't so far behind...mouths were still trying to get used to words & voices! Also, Marlene Dietrich candle-litten close-ups are worth gold! love it!
Just re-watched this again. One's reminded of Murnau's dictum "A camera angle should intensify, not exist solely for beauty." (I'm paraphrasing) That being said, almost every shot in this film is essential, not a single one extraneous. For now, my favorite of Von Sternberg's films, and perhaps one of the best examples of a perfect congruence between aesthetic and theme.