On August 1st, 1966, a sniper rode the elevator to the top floor of the University of Texas Tower and opened fire, holding the campus hostage for 96 minutes. When the gunshots were finally silenced, the toll included 16 dead, three dozen wounded, and a shaken nation left trying to understand.
This film is not currently playing on MUBI but 30 other great films are. See what's now showing
Rotoscoping animation doesn't always work right, but in 'Tower' it blends perfectly with the archive footage and the testimonials. Also, there aren't many documentaries with this amount of anxiety, thrill and commotion. Definitely a must-watch!
Through that blue sky alien comes. On the tower it shoots people to death and there is brutal landscape like western movie....“Tower” is a movie between real & unreal/reality & dream with slippery images of rotoscopy which has delicate touch like reality but surely different, telling us the truth of terror, bravery, vivid color of life and happiness now disappeared. Tough to watch yet amazing cinematic experience.
A historical event that traversed an emerging hyper-mediatized landscape. Dawn of the television age. We have some images. Captured and kept. But there is something at the heart of these early media events beneath the truncated archeology; the core of these experiences themselves. The experiences have a quality of the irreal. Precisely why the rotoscopy is the right choice. Too real to be assimilated as "reality."
America: the land of serial killers and vigilantes, psychopaths and heroes. The cartoon aesthetics perfectly capture the madness of it all. Alas, Maitland does not provide any contextual info. As a frame-by-frame reconstruction, Tower lacks interpretation. Weak heuristics. The "It was an act of a lonely madman" explanation is an excuse. Wasn't the entire history of America written by a legion of lonely mad men?
Maitland's documentary on the infamous '66 Texas clock tower shooting mixes archival footage, interview and rotoscopic animation capturing both the terror of the moment and the beginning of a phenomenon that rears its ugly head far too often. By keeping the focus on the ground with the victims and participants it does justice to those involved In giving no quarter to the assailant. One of the year's strongest docs.
To call this a technical achievement is incorrect - technically it's more seam than material - instead I would say it's an act of sorcery.
The Kaleidoscopic clashing of different animations (clear, jittery, colour and greyscale) and found footages, of acting and interviews, of real time and retrospective brings an uncanny immediacy to the events unfolding on the screen. ...
It is not perfect and it does not present you the whole story or any kind of analysis, but in choosing to tell a restrained but detailed account straight from the mouth of some of the very people who lived it and then using rotoscoping to some gripping effect, Tower acomplished something that very few documentaries about old crimes can. It is at the same time horrendous and intoxicating.
It might be a case of wrong time and film, but mostly the precision here translated to tedium, the layering of voices confirming a context rather than adding perspective. It's a thorough creation, but the voices, ensuring we hear what feels like 100 gun shots in the first 15 mins, are exhausting. All criticisms that in another mood might have read as praise.