Un filme que cae en el cliché sobre la fantasía cristalizadas de un niño inclinándose al deseo de las personas de su mismo género. Así como en película de Davies o Vas Sant (productor del filme), Archer apela a la soledad y la precariedad en la vida de un niño para excusar una suerte de "síntoma", aunque con un lenguaje presuntuoso.
The synopsis is, as usually on MUBI, far away from whats really in the movie.. Intriguingly, as the story leads you through, it looks like a typical gay boy story. However, never mentioned, I think Logan is Leah and Leah is Logan. Son of Venus and Mercury. A real one.
dull. pretty much the same story and exactly the same style as archer's 2003 short "bobbycrush". though it maintained that dreamy, ethereal execution, "wild tigers i have known" is pretentious and boring, an annoying attempt at an experimental, non-linear narrative. i expected more. though i will say that the original song on the credits was beautiful.
I'm surprised how much people dislike this film. I thought it was admirable how the director made a film with such a strong narrative using quite avant garde scenes. Logan's story was like a direct hit to my heart. I dunno though, maybe it's just that I related to story the story so much. I still thought the aesthetics were great.