These films fill a void, a time when the US could not see these Marxist marvels readily attack the establishment yet maintain the idea the people are the state, and the state is responsible for the people, not profit motive. Nationalized healthcare, energy, auto, etc. Today that most closely resembles the 1980s trickle down debacle, Godard’s approach is more than necessary. Use first names, initials if possible…
More interesting for its concept than its execution. There are elements that are interesting and funny but ultimately this is a piece designed to forbid passive viewing. Instead we are meant to think (hard!) and critique our bourgeois assumptions about the purpose of film and engage critically with the polemic. A bit of a slog but, regardless, it has the virtues of ambition and an admirable refusal to compromise.
Brecht/Artaud meets Sergio Leone. Images of the past superimposed on the present. The Revolutionary Moment. Question everything. What is cinema? You will not be allowed to be passive. You must allow yourself to think or you must flee the theater. What is it that fails and what is rewarded? Is revolutionary cinema possible? To act.
Pretentious but works somewhat, which can not always be said of Godard's political films. The first part on the mechanisms of strike is a good with minimal distraction through Eisenstein's critique. The second part is overly generic and self centred and did not bring me much.
What was May '68? Among other things it was a great big delirious inspiring mess. So it is w/ LE VENT D'EST. While we may wish to frame it otherwise, we have to face that Godard and his co-conspirators have doubled down hard on Marxist-Leninist orthodoxy. However, in trying to show us how to do militant cinema, they create a machine that runs so hot it might explode. Which is how we would have it. No? Right.
Nope, another tiresome lecture that didn't work for me. And I find it strange that more people don't find it more hypocritical to be told how to rise up and defeat the ruling class by voices that seem to have been more educated and privileged than a lot of the viewers being patronised. And don't start me on the childishly simplistic statements that are supposed to be deep and meaningful. Urgh!
There's so much going on in this and the other Dziga Vertov Groupe films, it's hard to take it all in without the pre-knowledge of the events. Either way, a challenging watch, but you come out of the other side wanting to start your own revolution, or just do something active or constructive, or find ways to re-invent cinema for your own generation - compelling.
Terrible. I think if there was someone less know behind the camera instead than Godard, this film would have a unanimous 1 star from all the reviewers. It's an excruciating tedious diatribe with one of the worse acting, and execution ever seen on screen. Paradoxically, this film can only ever being appreciated by intellectual of the bourgeoisie culture he criticises so much.