A post-apocalyptic ice age forces humanitys last survivors aboard a globe-spanning supertrain that functions via a perpetual-motion engine. One man will risk everything to incite a revolt for control of the engine and the future of the world.
यह फिल्म अभी MUBI पर नहीं चल रही है, लेकिन 30 अन्य महान फिल्में चल रही हैं। देखें क्या दिखाया जा रहा है अब दिखाया जा रहा है
Bong’s point is that the end of capitalism would not be possible without considerable violence on both sides. We see this also in the anti-capitalist films of the Soviet master Sergei Eisenstein, who also depicted scenes of violent upheaval and brutal repression in “Battleship Potemkin” and “Strike” (both 1925). The end of capitalism, it seems, would be tantamount to the end of the world.
Bong seems to understand something many others don’t, both about broad entertainment and the state of successful political action. Big action demands broad strokes; nuances emerge later. In fact, this is to a large degree the political subtext of Snowpiercer itself… Moving from car to car is a vulgar-Marxist revolt organized like a videogame, easy to understand and equally easy to dismiss.
We think we know what to expect from action scenes, just as we think we know what to expect from post-apocalyptic movies and tales of revolution. Again and again, Snowpiercer plays against the expectations it sets up. Up through its final moments, this is a film that is thrillingly, unnervingly unpredictable.
I avoided this film for two years because I had heard very mixed reactions, from this is horrible and overrated, to this is a genuine masterpiece. Upon watching it, I admit I fall into the latter camp.
There hasn't been a movie with this combination of gritty violence, wild imagination, and epically stunning visuals in like 10 years. It's like this came from an alternate reality where directors like The Wachowskis and Alex Proyas didn't sell out and make a bunch of wack cliche stuff. It often forgoes logic in place of creativity and visual awesomeness, but that's part of what makes it so great.
The political allegory in this is so heavy as to balance a massive multi-participant axe battle (among other things) and yet 2 weeks after watching this I am still chewing over wither the ending is hopeful or bleak?
Absolutely sure I'm not the only person to say this, but like Bioshock on a train, Snowpiercer is chock full of surprise, intensity, humor, and thoughtful insight. I went in blind and came out of one the better movie-going experiences I've had in recent member. Absolutely see this film in theaters while there's still a chance to- it's an exciting and unique experience that I won't forget, and honestly don't want to.
A formidable film with an inventive story, a great directing, an impeccable casting (I recognised several actors I had seen in "minor films" or series and was glad to see them there along with famous faces, all perfect in their roles), some right emotion and nice stylised action scenes far from the usual hollywoodian mess/crap. Chronologically speaking the last SF film about as great that I saw was Children of Men.
If Dickens would come back and see this description of misery against power, he would return to his grave totally disoriented ==== Si Zola ou Victor Hugo devaient voir cette description de la misère contre le pouvoir ils retourneraient dans leur tombe effarés.
Tried to give this film a second chance, but find it still very trivial and - regarding other films of Bong Joon-Ho - dissapointing. The train as metaphor for the world and the human struggle for life: that's not enough to make a good movie and doesn't bypass the gap between pathos and (unintentionally?) comical elements.
The distinctive look of the film is beset by flimsy, pompous writing that thinks it invented post-apocalyptic SF. Being unfamiliar with Le Transperceneige, I don't know if the adaptation or the source material is to blame. I'm inclined to believe the graphic novel had more time and room to evolve its themes and ideas into something coherent. At this point, I just don't care.