Cameron Diaz's awful accent or acting are the least of this film's troubles. Writer/director Richard Kelly has wild ideas about existence and God: apparently, we are all part of an elaborate experiment conducted by aliens who are in cahoots with NASA, NSA and insert-your-favorite-acronym. Yes, you should laugh at Kelly's pseudo-intellectualisms. But there's a definitive vision. He blunders with supreme confidence.
still don't know what to think about it : I spent a really nice time watching it, the original idea seems great, but the rest of the film in which Kelly tries to mindfuck us is absolutely terrible... At least I can admit that it was visually interesting. Kelly should avoid those kind of subjects where he tries to put philosophy at every corner in the movies. "Donnie Darko" was really cool... but this one is bad.
Richard Kelly's incredibly loose adaptation of Richard Matheson's short story gets off to an intriguing start, but soon looses its way completely. It's a well-shot film, with some solid performances (with the exception of an accent-mangling Cameron Diaz), but the plot degenerates into something like a half-baked fan script for 'The X-Files', leading to a cheesy, emotionally forced climax. Another miss for Kelly.
Not sure it is a disapointment. After all, Kelly did not try, for a second, to do a second Donnie Darko. But I do dare suggest this has exactelly the same plot device. (so I don't spoil, I will talk about it in the comments bellow).
I always liked the "pushing the button" thing... so this is a one for me, but I think Kelly wanted to declare too much and because of that, the mystery and the conclusion are getting lost. The atmosphere was captured great. Yes, it's not Donnie Darko, but it's often the same thing with directors, which first film is outstanding: they want the following films to be higher, bigger, better and that's not always BETTER!