For a better experience on MUBI, update your browser.

Venice 2011. Feel the Temptation

Aleksandr Sokurov finishes his tetralogy of power with a magnificent, grotesque adaptation of Goethe's _Faust_.

Aleksandr Sokurov loosely—one might even say wildly, fervently–adapts Goethe’s Faust with barely contained, gleeful passion to conclude his tetralogy of power (previously, all real biographical subjects: Lenin, Hitler, Hirohito). 

The mise en scène breaks out of the fetid, murmuring stasis so evocative of those three films and is freed to wander in a malleable, Ruizian manner around a sumptuously dirty and worn old German town of stone and earth. After opening first with a Forrest Gump-like descent of the camera from mirrored heavens flying down to the grimy, sprawling town, the second shot after this luxurious, fantastical one introduces Faust (Johannes Zeiler) via the decomposing ash-purple penis of a corpse he is dissecting in poverty and philosophical inquiry. With no money for food (let alone gravediggers), the man first approaches and then is chased, accompanied and pursued by (and later pursues himself) the town’s money-lender (Anton Adasinsky)—the film's devil.

Faust then truly stretches its legs, with its whole course feeling like a frenzied walk in a crooked loop around the world, peering into crannies, stepping into taverns, washrooms and apartments, circling the town forest. Bodies are all in motion, above all the manic, lurching and malformed money-lender and the relentlessly pacing Faust, all is frustrated, eager circulation, all tied to the constant questions the man asks himself, asks no one, and asks in the fluid dialogues with those around him which weave between the quotidian and the philosophical.

These endless inquiries, this nervous motion, it is paced if not powered by a truly wonderfully grotesque humor of the earthly, lower-body type, sex jokes, farting and pratfalls. Faust is relentlessly physical, characters stumbling, slugging, touching, cloying—the world is cramped and moist and so tactile the people seem like mobile plants grown from this overripe mess.  Faust himself is born in motion, questioning, but his ambitions lower the more he talks himself (and is talked to by and with the devil)—he begins asking about the soul but quickly lowers his sights to mere food, money and lust, asking, even craving a curse for, eventually, so little in such a lonely world.  (Then again, a time-stopping sequence of subjective close-ups of Faust’s longed-for Marguerite, bathed in holy golden light, eyes downcast, face fair, pale and young, may, in comparison to all the sun-sucking filth of the world around this dream, be worth flirting close to damnation for.)

Sokurov's previous three films in this series have all had a tight, claustrophobic grandeur to them, a dense, damp weight-like scope to their minute focus. Faust, as the grand finale, opens the group up, beginning and ending in a world outside man's spaces, and the movement between befits the fictional legacy of the source material, giving this one man so many questions, so much energy, so many chances.  Yet in the end he is as trapped as the rest who were tempted, enthralled or otherwise imbued with ungodly power on this earth; in a way, Faust ends as Molokh (1999), Taurus (2001) and The Sun (2005) begin, past the brief heights of glory and opening to an abyss of suffering.  (I am reminded, incidentally, of the way Sternberg's The Scarlet Empress seems to chart the prequel narrative to the rest of his works with Dietrich.)  That Faust is able to take place before these works about real men allows us finally to see the origins, the temptation, the decision and the precipice of the descent—and since we are yet before hell, the path to get there is, remarkably, a vibrantly soulful, terrible and funny feast.

By your description of Sokurov’s film – its “grotesque humor” and “relentlessly physical” nature – it sounds as if it’s of a piece with Jan Švankmajer’s Faust of 1994. Is that so?
I haven’t seen JS’s FAUST in ages but from my memory they share certain tonal and textural similarities but generally are very, very different.
Daniel, I envoy you so much right now. :) And as you described Faust’s “relentlessly physical nature”, it seems to me that Sokurov’s approach to “closeness”, which can be seen in many films of his films, has reached its logical conclusion? Or maybe its merely a parody by Sokurov for Sokurov? Nevertheless, I wish I can see the film and share your joy, as I have little to believe I won’t love the film. Screw biases, its Sokurov!
I see you’re partial to fair, pale-faced girls! Whose do you like better, Sokurov’s or Ferrara’s?
It’s one of the festival’s main motifs, along with close-ups of genitals!

Please to add a new comment.

Previous Features